This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gemology and Jewelry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I stubbed it after a quick search engine query. I saw tons of articles. It turns out there is really only one or two articles sold to lots of publications. So, is this really notable? Only a couple of companies make this, and one is mentioned again and again. So, this article could be seen as promotional. Will the subject be interesting in 30 years? Should this be PRODded or AfDed? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC) reply

• Article was retained per the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breast milk jewelry. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC) reply