![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How come the US enters another soveiring country, demands full access to technological secrets (who are allegedly cheaper, stronger and overall better) than the tech it uses, in the pretense claim that its inspections WMD (in a country like Brazil!), while NOT accepting inspections themselves?!? LtDoc 04:08, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
What would they inspect? The nature of inspections are to ensure that a state is using nuclear research for peaceful purposes only. What would inspections find? That the US had a nuclear weapons program? Ok, but the US is allowed a NW arsenal under the NPT. Brazil isn't, which is why Brazil, and every other member of the NPT who is a non-nuclear weapons state has inspections. Moreover, it is not the US that demands full acesss to technological secrets, or inspections, it is the IAEA, an body of the UN, that conducts inspections (which all non-nuclear weapons signatories agree to).
Waht does anyu of this have to do with wikipedia anyway? this section is supposed to be related to the article, it's not (and it's not supposed to be) in any way an open forum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.4.213.116 ( talk) 00:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I think it is important to note that both Condolessa and Colin Powell has estated that they have no reason to believe that Brazil would ever use nuclear technologies to develop weapns. Also, Brazilian's costitution forbids it.
All the criticism from USA to Brazi's nuclear program came from crappy journalists -- not government. -- Pinnecco 13:32, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
User:Guinsberg removed sourced information and ruled Veja (magazine) as not a reliable source by his own value judgements. The information is restored. Accusing a source of "rightwing" not only leads to bias, but violates the Wikipedia:NPOV policy and relies on a simple Wikipedia:I just don't like it maneuver. -- Ciao 90 ( talk) 18:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your input, Lecen. Please, look at the Article's history. Ciao has provided some links to Veja online on the issue. How, or how much, those links support Ciao's edits, I do not know, however. Guinsberg ( talk) 20:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Deletion was proposed and the following reason was given:
The deletion tag should not be removed, until the editors discuss it. Thanks. Alex Covarrubias ( Talk? ) 08:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Rather than getting into a reversion cycle, I wanted to start a discussion here. One editor has made multiple changes to the introduction of the article that suggest that Brazil has a nuclear weapons program and will soon have the capability to produce nuclear weapons. When I read these edits yesterday they struck me as unreliable, despite the citations. I checked a couple of the citations and they seemed either unreliable or misrepresented in the text. There may be parts of the recent edits that are worth keeping, but I think most of them are mistaken. That's why I took the uncomfortable step of reverting them all. Better to start with the article as it was and discuss the claims one at a time. NPguy ( talk) 02:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Brazil and weapons of mass destruction was recently nominated for deletion. The result was keep and the case was closed yesterday. During the AfD, I inserted a rescue tag to see if we could improve the article. I edited the article and added about 20 reliable sources, including SIPRI, Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, Arms Control Association, GlobalSecurity.org, Global Security Institute, German Council on Foreign Relations, to name a few. I didn't make any major changes - I basically reworded some parts (to reflect the sources), improved the lead and added a history section. Now, User:NPguy has reverted all my edits, and with it, erased all the sources. Limongi ( talk) 13:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
1 (globalsecurity.org) -2 (the articel) gives: +September -President Fernando Collor de Mello -That October, he formally
This plagiarism. If anybody want the material in than rephrase it 100% or make it a quote! I did not look in the rest of the article, but somebody should do so! --18:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Brazil and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Brazil and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jornaldaciencia.org.br/Detalhe.jsp?id=15243{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jornaldaciencia.org.br/Detalhe.jsp?id=15243When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Brazil and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How come the US enters another soveiring country, demands full access to technological secrets (who are allegedly cheaper, stronger and overall better) than the tech it uses, in the pretense claim that its inspections WMD (in a country like Brazil!), while NOT accepting inspections themselves?!? LtDoc 04:08, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
What would they inspect? The nature of inspections are to ensure that a state is using nuclear research for peaceful purposes only. What would inspections find? That the US had a nuclear weapons program? Ok, but the US is allowed a NW arsenal under the NPT. Brazil isn't, which is why Brazil, and every other member of the NPT who is a non-nuclear weapons state has inspections. Moreover, it is not the US that demands full acesss to technological secrets, or inspections, it is the IAEA, an body of the UN, that conducts inspections (which all non-nuclear weapons signatories agree to).
Waht does anyu of this have to do with wikipedia anyway? this section is supposed to be related to the article, it's not (and it's not supposed to be) in any way an open forum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.4.213.116 ( talk) 00:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I think it is important to note that both Condolessa and Colin Powell has estated that they have no reason to believe that Brazil would ever use nuclear technologies to develop weapns. Also, Brazilian's costitution forbids it.
All the criticism from USA to Brazi's nuclear program came from crappy journalists -- not government. -- Pinnecco 13:32, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
User:Guinsberg removed sourced information and ruled Veja (magazine) as not a reliable source by his own value judgements. The information is restored. Accusing a source of "rightwing" not only leads to bias, but violates the Wikipedia:NPOV policy and relies on a simple Wikipedia:I just don't like it maneuver. -- Ciao 90 ( talk) 18:25, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your input, Lecen. Please, look at the Article's history. Ciao has provided some links to Veja online on the issue. How, or how much, those links support Ciao's edits, I do not know, however. Guinsberg ( talk) 20:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Deletion was proposed and the following reason was given:
The deletion tag should not be removed, until the editors discuss it. Thanks. Alex Covarrubias ( Talk? ) 08:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Rather than getting into a reversion cycle, I wanted to start a discussion here. One editor has made multiple changes to the introduction of the article that suggest that Brazil has a nuclear weapons program and will soon have the capability to produce nuclear weapons. When I read these edits yesterday they struck me as unreliable, despite the citations. I checked a couple of the citations and they seemed either unreliable or misrepresented in the text. There may be parts of the recent edits that are worth keeping, but I think most of them are mistaken. That's why I took the uncomfortable step of reverting them all. Better to start with the article as it was and discuss the claims one at a time. NPguy ( talk) 02:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Brazil and weapons of mass destruction was recently nominated for deletion. The result was keep and the case was closed yesterday. During the AfD, I inserted a rescue tag to see if we could improve the article. I edited the article and added about 20 reliable sources, including SIPRI, Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, Arms Control Association, GlobalSecurity.org, Global Security Institute, German Council on Foreign Relations, to name a few. I didn't make any major changes - I basically reworded some parts (to reflect the sources), improved the lead and added a history section. Now, User:NPguy has reverted all my edits, and with it, erased all the sources. Limongi ( talk) 13:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
1 (globalsecurity.org) -2 (the articel) gives: +September -President Fernando Collor de Mello -That October, he formally
This plagiarism. If anybody want the material in than rephrase it 100% or make it a quote! I did not look in the rest of the article, but somebody should do so! --18:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Brazil and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 06:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Brazil and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jornaldaciencia.org.br/Detalhe.jsp?id=15243{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.jornaldaciencia.org.br/Detalhe.jsp?id=15243When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Brazil and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)