This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some more things this case could use

• Finish the outline (see here)
• Include links to the dissents
• Full names of all litigants
• A cite check for subsequent authority TheronJ 21:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC) reply

More:

• Fix infobox listing of concurrences and dissents
• Fix line-up of votes.
• Harlan concurred in the judgment, but did not file a separate opinion in this case. The block quote attributed to him in the "Concurrence/dissent (Harlan)" section is from Justice Brennan's opinion. Harlan's section should be deleted, and the mis-attributed quote incorporated into Brennan's section, if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.167.119.235 ( talk) 02:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC) reply

TheronJ 17:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC) reply