This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about
electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the
project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles
BrainChip is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
@
Tails Wx: such parts are unsourced because other reviewers have been consistently telling me to reduce the number of references to BrainChip publications (and "affiliated" agency publications) including the data page about the AKD processor. I seem to be having significant difficulty navigating the complex rules of writing on Wikipedia.
Birdmanoftech (
talk)
04:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Which diff, then? I can't explain to you about "other reviewers have been consistently telling me to reduce the number of references" without diffs. Additionally, skimming through the references, I don't see
in depth coverage of BrainChip in some sources. Not all, but some.
TailsWx04:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
ah thank you. some of the more recent diffs under Birdmanoftech are deleting references because I talked with some editors about how to make the article worthy and they said that any references from BrainChip or Brainchip partners or news publications that had even a slight connection with the company were not to be used.
Birdmanoftech (
talk)
05:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Myself, I would select 3 best sources and write an article based mainly on them - with limited use of other reliable sources (eg. passing mentions only) to fill some missing details. This way, you would see, if you are even able to write an acceptable article: you need multiple reliable sources with broad enough coverage of the article subject (passing mentions or lone paragraph aren't enough). Note my experience with the AfC process is limited, I write mostly about computer history related subjects, where are next to none of the usual issues of the company articles (promotion, COI, churnalism...). Take my comments as a general observation and follow instructions of the AfC reviewers. In the end, the company may be not notable yet for an article.
Pavlor (
talk)
08:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
I've added a few. I'll leave it up to another AfC reviewer, there is a re-submit button if you would like to re-submit.
TailsWx17:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The
middle one is the best source listed here but it lacks a byline so could be criticized as having been derived from a press release with little editorial control. The first looks like an actual press release. The last is some sort of a proposal from one of Brainchip's customers, not a
reliable source ~
Kvng (
talk)
03:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Are these acceptable? The publishers are not well known but they all have a byline.
This makes it a marginal case. I have accepted the draft. There is a reasonable chance someone will be successful at deleting it. ~
Kvng (
talk)
04:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Have now also added two articles from EETimes:
"BrainChip Launches Event-Domain AI Inference Dev Kits".
This article is nothing more than an attempt to promote an obscure Australian penny stock with two dozen employees. Brainchip shareholders have discussed creating a Wiki article multiple times on
HotCopper an Australian website primarily devoted to discussing small cap stocks. Brainchip has no commercial products and negligible revenue (far less than $1M pa).
BrisV (
talk)
17:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)reply
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about
electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the
project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles
BrainChip is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
@
Tails Wx: such parts are unsourced because other reviewers have been consistently telling me to reduce the number of references to BrainChip publications (and "affiliated" agency publications) including the data page about the AKD processor. I seem to be having significant difficulty navigating the complex rules of writing on Wikipedia.
Birdmanoftech (
talk)
04:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Which diff, then? I can't explain to you about "other reviewers have been consistently telling me to reduce the number of references" without diffs. Additionally, skimming through the references, I don't see
in depth coverage of BrainChip in some sources. Not all, but some.
TailsWx04:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
ah thank you. some of the more recent diffs under Birdmanoftech are deleting references because I talked with some editors about how to make the article worthy and they said that any references from BrainChip or Brainchip partners or news publications that had even a slight connection with the company were not to be used.
Birdmanoftech (
talk)
05:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Myself, I would select 3 best sources and write an article based mainly on them - with limited use of other reliable sources (eg. passing mentions only) to fill some missing details. This way, you would see, if you are even able to write an acceptable article: you need multiple reliable sources with broad enough coverage of the article subject (passing mentions or lone paragraph aren't enough). Note my experience with the AfC process is limited, I write mostly about computer history related subjects, where are next to none of the usual issues of the company articles (promotion, COI, churnalism...). Take my comments as a general observation and follow instructions of the AfC reviewers. In the end, the company may be not notable yet for an article.
Pavlor (
talk)
08:26, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
I've added a few. I'll leave it up to another AfC reviewer, there is a re-submit button if you would like to re-submit.
TailsWx17:02, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The
middle one is the best source listed here but it lacks a byline so could be criticized as having been derived from a press release with little editorial control. The first looks like an actual press release. The last is some sort of a proposal from one of Brainchip's customers, not a
reliable source ~
Kvng (
talk)
03:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Are these acceptable? The publishers are not well known but they all have a byline.
This makes it a marginal case. I have accepted the draft. There is a reasonable chance someone will be successful at deleting it. ~
Kvng (
talk)
04:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Have now also added two articles from EETimes:
"BrainChip Launches Event-Domain AI Inference Dev Kits".
This article is nothing more than an attempt to promote an obscure Australian penny stock with two dozen employees. Brainchip shareholders have discussed creating a Wiki article multiple times on
HotCopper an Australian website primarily devoted to discussing small cap stocks. Brainchip has no commercial products and negligible revenue (far less than $1M pa).
BrisV (
talk)
17:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)reply