![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Braga Incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The article's incident is unnoticeable outside of the context of wider criticisms of Confucius Institutes, which has its dedicated article. Therefore I propose this article be merged into Criticism of Confucius Institutes.-- LucasGeorge ( talk) 07:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
The description of the incident is incomprehensible. In one paragraph it says that Xu Lin demanded the removal of references to Taiwanese institutions. In the next paragraph it says that she demanded the removal of references to the Confucius China Studies Program, which is a PRC program. It is also not made clear how Xu Lin obtained control of the materials distributed at the conference. Did she simply steal the printed materials? Or did she exert pressure on the organizers? Or was she herself one of the organizers and in charge of the conference? Bill ( talk) 05:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Braga Incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The article's incident is unnoticeable outside of the context of wider criticisms of Confucius Institutes, which has its dedicated article. Therefore I propose this article be merged into Criticism of Confucius Institutes.-- LucasGeorge ( talk) 07:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
The description of the incident is incomprehensible. In one paragraph it says that Xu Lin demanded the removal of references to Taiwanese institutions. In the next paragraph it says that she demanded the removal of references to the Confucius China Studies Program, which is a PRC program. It is also not made clear how Xu Lin obtained control of the materials distributed at the conference. Did she simply steal the printed materials? Or did she exert pressure on the organizers? Or was she herself one of the organizers and in charge of the conference? Bill ( talk) 05:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)