![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
The article claims that Brachialis produces 50% more force than Biceps Brachii. A secondary citation is provided to Saladin Anatomy & Physiology. However, the Saladan A&P textbook gives no source for this claim. I have attempted to search Google Scholar to find verification for this claim and have been unsuccessful which leads me to suspect that the claim may be untrue or unverified. Android9097 ( talk) 23:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
"the teichmann muscle" is not a notable name for the brachialis muscle for it to be in the actual opening text of this articles. ive literally never heard of this name before today, and it is most assuredly not notable, or a hoax. if it's not a hoax, and has some notability to it, it should be moved to an "alternate names" section with information about why that name is there.
also, just a side note, i think it's really weird, absurd even, that we name anatomical body parts *after people*. i don't particularly care to honor some dude who first cut up cadavers and identified each little miniscule part in my body by literally naming body parts after them. it's just... creepy to me. we've had these parts for hundreds of thousands, millions of years, and it just seems like a ridiculous farce to give some special credit to a person just cuz they were the first person
i would create an account and try to make changes myself, but the last several times i tried that, a bot immediately reversed my changes. im tired of being bullied by computers - people were bad enough. anyway, one day i might actually make an account and do editing work here i have time I'm bored idk I'll shut up now -jadephoenix 2600:6C47:A03F:C443:59C6:8A8C:65AE:996C ( talk) 02:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
The article claims that Brachialis produces 50% more force than Biceps Brachii. A secondary citation is provided to Saladin Anatomy & Physiology. However, the Saladan A&P textbook gives no source for this claim. I have attempted to search Google Scholar to find verification for this claim and have been unsuccessful which leads me to suspect that the claim may be untrue or unverified. Android9097 ( talk) 23:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
"the teichmann muscle" is not a notable name for the brachialis muscle for it to be in the actual opening text of this articles. ive literally never heard of this name before today, and it is most assuredly not notable, or a hoax. if it's not a hoax, and has some notability to it, it should be moved to an "alternate names" section with information about why that name is there.
also, just a side note, i think it's really weird, absurd even, that we name anatomical body parts *after people*. i don't particularly care to honor some dude who first cut up cadavers and identified each little miniscule part in my body by literally naming body parts after them. it's just... creepy to me. we've had these parts for hundreds of thousands, millions of years, and it just seems like a ridiculous farce to give some special credit to a person just cuz they were the first person
i would create an account and try to make changes myself, but the last several times i tried that, a bot immediately reversed my changes. im tired of being bullied by computers - people were bad enough. anyway, one day i might actually make an account and do editing work here i have time I'm bored idk I'll shut up now -jadephoenix 2600:6C47:A03F:C443:59C6:8A8C:65AE:996C ( talk) 02:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)