 | Text and/or other creative content from Botanisk Have, Aarhus was copied or moved into Aarhus Botanical Gardens with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge into Aarhus Botanical Gardens. -- Favonian ( talk) 20:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
The articles Aarhus Botanical Gardens and Botanisk Have, Aarhus obviously describe the same topic and should be merged, but the question remains which one should be the target of the merger. Botanisk Have, Aarhus is the older of the two by a couple of years, is linked to by a couple of foreign language articles, and carries the correct Danish name. I consider these arguments, albeit not overwhelmingly strong ones, in favor of letting that article be the target. Favonian ( talk) 21:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- The response has been overwhelming ;) In spite of my initial arguments, I opt for Aarhus Botanical Gardens as the destination. Using English names is probably to be preferred on this English Wikipedia, and it "rhymes" with University of Copenhagen Botanical Garden. Favonian ( talk) 20:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
| Text and/or other creative content from Botanisk Have, Aarhus was copied or moved into Aarhus Botanical Gardens with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge into Aarhus Botanical Gardens. -- Favonian ( talk) 20:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
The articles Aarhus Botanical Gardens and Botanisk Have, Aarhus obviously describe the same topic and should be merged, but the question remains which one should be the target of the merger. Botanisk Have, Aarhus is the older of the two by a couple of years, is linked to by a couple of foreign language articles, and carries the correct Danish name. I consider these arguments, albeit not overwhelmingly strong ones, in favor of letting that article be the target. Favonian ( talk) 21:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- The response has been overwhelming ;) In spite of my initial arguments, I opt for Aarhus Botanical Gardens as the destination. Using English names is probably to be preferred on this English Wikipedia, and it "rhymes" with University of Copenhagen Botanical Garden. Favonian ( talk) 20:25, 31 January 2010 (UTC)