Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! ( talk · contribs) 22:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Giving a look. — Ed! ^(talk) 22:54, 19 January 2019 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   Pass Dab links, dup links, external links tools show no problems. Copyio tool returns yellow thanks to similar wording to one of the sources. Any chance you can do a bit to differentiate the wording?

   • Apparently, the last time I checked the detector if there are any issues the website wasn't there. Perhaps it's a mirror website? Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

   Source spotcheck Refs 12, 27 and 32 all property back up cited details in the article.

3. It is broad in its coverage:

   Not Yet

   • Is there larger context about the planning and design for the line itself and what prompted this site specifically for a station?

      Partly done Can't find much about why Boston Manor was chosen as one of the locations for a stop but I elaborated a small idea for its connection to another railway. Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

   • Location: Any chance for details on local population in a walking distance to this station or ridership along the line?

     Same reason as in the Becontree station article. Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

   • History: What was the construction company that built the initial station? How much did it cost? And an architect for the original building?

     Construction company was DR, how much and the architect, I don't have details since the Charles Holden structure got more coverage. Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

   • What was the architectural style of the original building?

     I can only describe it as the typical DR style building. You can take a look at the pic ref. Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

   • What's the square footage of the new building?

     Can't find details for this though sorry :( Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

   • Any more detail on what specifically will be done to the station for the 2022 update?

      Not done nope, Tfl didn't provide any additional detail for this. Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

   • Any chance for station succession data (neighboring stations) as is included in many NYC Metro station articles?

     What exactly is this? Are you thinking of a routebox - the article already has one, at Boston Manor tube station#External links. -- Redrose64 🌹 ( talk) 12:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

     Yes, that works. — Ed! ^(talk) 13:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC) reply

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   Pass No problems there.

5. It is stable:

   Pass No problems there.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   Pass Six images tagged PD and CC where appropriate.

7. Other:

   On Hold Pending some improvements. — Ed! ^(talk) 23:29, 19 January 2019 (UTC) reply

   Again, I pretty much addressed most of the issues, Ed!. Is this good to go? Vincent ^LUFan ( talk) ( Kenton!) 06:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

OK. I think you've got the gist of anything major I was thinking of. Based on these improvements, going to Pass the GAN. Thanks for your responses! — Ed! ^(talk) 20:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC) reply