This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Bose headphones article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about List of Bose headphones. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about List of Bose headphones at the Reference desk. |
|
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
|
Page last archived by — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 13:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC) (Reason: Talk page 76KB long)
This article reads like a PR press release cleverly disguised as a 3rd party text. Many of the footnotes are links to Bose's website. Other links are to positive reviews of Bose's products. There are no negative reviews or comments, no mention of competing products, no reference to group reviews. Altogether, this article is of questionable value, to put it charitably.
At the very least, more links to truly independent reviews should be included. Some links are mentioned in a section here below. Star-lists ( talk) 20:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The following sources have been moved here from the second Afd. Please strike them out as they have been added to the article text. John Vandenberg 08:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
The page was getting too huge so I archived 75KB worth of discussions. — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 14:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
^ A. V. Bykhovskii. Sposob polawlenija shuma w scluchowom organe (Technique for noise suppression in the ear), 1960, Patent UdSSR SU 133 631. Filed: 24 August 1949. Published: Patent Bulletin No. 22. Citation from Tokhi and Veres (2002).
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.181.173 ( talk) 16:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Here are 2 images not bing used currently. I am placing them here on the talk page to keep a link to them encase they are needed in the future. -- UKPhoenix79 ( talk) 03:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
It would be great if a section on in-ear headphones could be created (currently it is only referred to in Criticism) 1292simon ( talk) 08:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The purpose of the overhaul was to 1) structure the article according to widely recognised product type (eg on-ear, in-ear, rather than Bose's uncommon categorizations) 2) make it sound less like an advertisement and 3) remove unnecessary Bose jargon. Therefore I am restoring this content (which was reverted). Discussion welcome!! 1292simon ( talk) 08:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Is the ambient noise rejection different to the original Bose Bluetooth headset? When comparing the text for the two entries, it looks like the same feature, but feel free to add it back in to this section if it is different for the Series 2. 1292simon ( talk) 05:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Ok lets try and figure this out here There are 4 types of headphones from Bose.
Neither of us disagree about joining groups 1 & 2, and there isn't a disagreement about group 4. But neither of us can agree on what to call group 3. I don't think Scientific names make sense, nor calling them on ear since Bose sells on ear around ear and in ear. Neither do I believe that there should be a category for each one by themselves. Bose used to call them Triport headphones, but checking their website they call them audio headphones. I think that might be a bit confusing. But I think either one would work. -- Phoenix ( talk) 06:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm not convinced by this edit. Shouldn't the article sort under "B" in most of its categories, and under "H" in Category:Bose Corporation? -- John of Reading ( talk) 19:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, my edit has too many changes to be accurately described in an edit summary, so I am justifying it here instead:
If other editors do not agree with any of the referenced claims, it would be appreciated if you could use this Talk page or provide references to justify your position, rather than deleting referenced text without explanation. Thanks 1292simon ( talk) 11:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\barmy-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—
cyberbot II
NotifyOnline
20:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of Bose headphones article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about List of Bose headphones. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about List of Bose headphones at the Reference desk. |
|
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
|
|
Page last archived by — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 13:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC) (Reason: Talk page 76KB long)
This article reads like a PR press release cleverly disguised as a 3rd party text. Many of the footnotes are links to Bose's website. Other links are to positive reviews of Bose's products. There are no negative reviews or comments, no mention of competing products, no reference to group reviews. Altogether, this article is of questionable value, to put it charitably.
At the very least, more links to truly independent reviews should be included. Some links are mentioned in a section here below. Star-lists ( talk) 20:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The following sources have been moved here from the second Afd. Please strike them out as they have been added to the article text. John Vandenberg 08:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
The page was getting too huge so I archived 75KB worth of discussions. — Vesther ( U * T/R * CTD) 14:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
^ A. V. Bykhovskii. Sposob polawlenija shuma w scluchowom organe (Technique for noise suppression in the ear), 1960, Patent UdSSR SU 133 631. Filed: 24 August 1949. Published: Patent Bulletin No. 22. Citation from Tokhi and Veres (2002).
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.181.173 ( talk) 16:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Here are 2 images not bing used currently. I am placing them here on the talk page to keep a link to them encase they are needed in the future. -- UKPhoenix79 ( talk) 03:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
It would be great if a section on in-ear headphones could be created (currently it is only referred to in Criticism) 1292simon ( talk) 08:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The purpose of the overhaul was to 1) structure the article according to widely recognised product type (eg on-ear, in-ear, rather than Bose's uncommon categorizations) 2) make it sound less like an advertisement and 3) remove unnecessary Bose jargon. Therefore I am restoring this content (which was reverted). Discussion welcome!! 1292simon ( talk) 08:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Is the ambient noise rejection different to the original Bose Bluetooth headset? When comparing the text for the two entries, it looks like the same feature, but feel free to add it back in to this section if it is different for the Series 2. 1292simon ( talk) 05:51, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Ok lets try and figure this out here There are 4 types of headphones from Bose.
Neither of us disagree about joining groups 1 & 2, and there isn't a disagreement about group 4. But neither of us can agree on what to call group 3. I don't think Scientific names make sense, nor calling them on ear since Bose sells on ear around ear and in ear. Neither do I believe that there should be a category for each one by themselves. Bose used to call them Triport headphones, but checking their website they call them audio headphones. I think that might be a bit confusing. But I think either one would work. -- Phoenix ( talk) 06:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm not convinced by this edit. Shouldn't the article sort under "B" in most of its categories, and under "H" in Category:Bose Corporation? -- John of Reading ( talk) 19:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, my edit has too many changes to be accurately described in an edit summary, so I am justifying it here instead:
If other editors do not agree with any of the referenced claims, it would be appreciated if you could use this Talk page or provide references to justify your position, rather than deleting referenced text without explanation. Thanks 1292simon ( talk) 11:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\barmy-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—
cyberbot II
NotifyOnline
20:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)