Borman Expressway was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
GA
This article is well written, it has a well written lead, and it's broad in its coverage. It also has reliable references from InDOT and citations throughout the article, therefore I'm passing the article. -- JA10T ·
C 01:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I disagree, but I don't care to find and follow the process to remove GA status, so I'll leave it. --
NE2 03:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)reply
It is a bit short, but the road is only 12 miles long. It seems to be well cited and content complete. —
Rob(talk) 03:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The writing is pretty choppy, and the reason for the renumbering is unsourced. The route description could definitely be expanded, and I have a hard time believing that's all that can be written about the history. --
NE2 03:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)reply
USRD GA audit
This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to
WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see
WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed.
I added a cite for the flooding, as there was flooding in August 20007 as well, and measures are in place to alleviate the flooding this section could be expanded
I made some copy-eits and re-arranged the pictures to improve the format. Article keeps GA status. I recommend that a map is added to this article, but it is not a GA requirement.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 18:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Self-published sources
There are two in use in this article. They need to be replaced. As high of esteem as we old various
roadgeeks and their person websites, they are still
self-published and fall outside of policy and the GA criteria. If not resolved in a reasonable time period, this article will have to be de-listed as a GA. Imzadi 1979→ 01:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Borman Expressway was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
state highways and other major
roads in the
United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
GA
This article is well written, it has a well written lead, and it's broad in its coverage. It also has reliable references from InDOT and citations throughout the article, therefore I'm passing the article. -- JA10T ·
C 01:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)reply
I disagree, but I don't care to find and follow the process to remove GA status, so I'll leave it. --
NE2 03:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)reply
It is a bit short, but the road is only 12 miles long. It seems to be well cited and content complete. —
Rob(talk) 03:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)reply
The writing is pretty choppy, and the reason for the renumbering is unsourced. The route description could definitely be expanded, and I have a hard time believing that's all that can be written about the history. --
NE2 03:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)reply
USRD GA audit
This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to
WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see
WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed.
I added a cite for the flooding, as there was flooding in August 20007 as well, and measures are in place to alleviate the flooding this section could be expanded
I made some copy-eits and re-arranged the pictures to improve the format. Article keeps GA status. I recommend that a map is added to this article, but it is not a GA requirement.
Jezhotwells (
talk) 18:42, 23 January 2010 (UTC)reply
Self-published sources
There are two in use in this article. They need to be replaced. As high of esteem as we old various
roadgeeks and their person websites, they are still
self-published and fall outside of policy and the GA criteria. If not resolved in a reasonable time period, this article will have to be de-listed as a GA. Imzadi 1979→ 01:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)reply