This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I like Haggai, because it is part of the Bible! It's a cool book. I like how the author gets right to the point.
§What do you guys think of Haggai?§
64.141.54.95 20:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Georgia Reynolds 64.141.54.95 20:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Isn't it a little pompus to use "B.C.E." to date the year a book of the Bible was written?
There is no citation for the "Date" section of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akarr1953 ( talk • contribs) 10:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
"A closer look" section lacks citations, esp. for Roman dating of prophecies and events. Akarr1953 ( talk) 10:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I like Haggai, because it is part of the Bible! It's a cool book. I like how the author gets right to the point.
§What do you guys think of Haggai?§
64.141.54.95 20:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)Georgia Reynolds 64.141.54.95 20:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Isn't it a little pompus to use "B.C.E." to date the year a book of the Bible was written?
There is no citation for the "Date" section of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akarr1953 ( talk • contribs) 10:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
"A closer look" section lacks citations, esp. for Roman dating of prophecies and events. Akarr1953 ( talk) 10:47, 1 May 2014 (UTC)