The result was: promoted by
Dying (
talk)
14:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Created by Bruxton ( talk). Self-nominated at 21:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bondiola sandwich; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 00:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I plan to review this tonight.
ツLunaEatsTuna (
💬)—
00:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
All images used are relevant, of good quality and copyright-free:
File:Bondiola Sandwich with fixings.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 2.0;File:Bondiola.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 2.0.I am so used to writing articles in this way but I can change it. Bruxton ( talk) 01:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I see that Grilled cheese, uses history, Submarine sandwich uses History and etymology, Cheesesteak uses history. Many sandwich articles are stubs so they have no sections. Bruxton ( talk) 16:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I was pretty thorough but I will see if I missed anything. Bruxton ( talk) 01:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 1, 3, 4, 6 or 7.
removed
Short desc, See also, navbox and cats look good.
removed and moved the commons to last section per MOS:ORDER Bruxton ( talk) 02:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
This is an exceptionally badly written article. Possibly the author's first language isn't English? In any event:
> The article never make it clear if "bondiola" refers to the sandwich specifically, or to the meat which is the basis of the sandwich.
> The article has a "history" section, which contains no history, but is rather a description of the sandwich.
> The "description" section starts in the middle, describing variations on the sandwich (which was described in the previous section) and then abruptly switches to describing how the meat is prepared. These would be better as seperate sections.
> The article describes "boston butt" as a sandwich (equivalent to bondiola sandwich), which it is not (it is a cut of raw meat, not equivalent to anything described in the article).
To the author's credit, there don't seem to be any misspelled words or egregious grammar errors. But the reviewers of the article should be ashamed of themselves for calling it a "good article". 2601:589:300:CA70:A8C7:6023:7DB4:25BA ( talk) 18:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Dying (
talk)
14:37, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Created by Bruxton ( talk). Self-nominated at 21:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bondiola sandwich; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 00:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I plan to review this tonight.
ツLunaEatsTuna (
💬)—
00:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
All images used are relevant, of good quality and copyright-free:
File:Bondiola Sandwich with fixings.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 2.0;File:Bondiola.jpg
: CC-BY-SA 2.0.I am so used to writing articles in this way but I can change it. Bruxton ( talk) 01:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I see that Grilled cheese, uses history, Submarine sandwich uses History and etymology, Cheesesteak uses history. Many sandwich articles are stubs so they have no sections. Bruxton ( talk) 16:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I was pretty thorough but I will see if I missed anything. Bruxton ( talk) 01:39, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 1, 3, 4, 6 or 7.
removed
Short desc, See also, navbox and cats look good.
removed and moved the commons to last section per MOS:ORDER Bruxton ( talk) 02:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
This is an exceptionally badly written article. Possibly the author's first language isn't English? In any event:
> The article never make it clear if "bondiola" refers to the sandwich specifically, or to the meat which is the basis of the sandwich.
> The article has a "history" section, which contains no history, but is rather a description of the sandwich.
> The "description" section starts in the middle, describing variations on the sandwich (which was described in the previous section) and then abruptly switches to describing how the meat is prepared. These would be better as seperate sections.
> The article describes "boston butt" as a sandwich (equivalent to bondiola sandwich), which it is not (it is a cut of raw meat, not equivalent to anything described in the article).
To the author's credit, there don't seem to be any misspelled words or egregious grammar errors. But the reviewers of the article should be ashamed of themselves for calling it a "good article". 2601:589:300:CA70:A8C7:6023:7DB4:25BA ( talk) 18:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)