The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 06:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I'll do this one, comments to follow over next few days.
Zawed (
talk)
06:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Comments
Looks really good Nick, only two substantive points:
- Infobox: Shizuichi Tanaka is mentioned as a commander/leader but doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in body of article.
- I've added him in a note. None of the sources mentions him as having played an active role in this battle, but he was the overall commander Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Departure section: "in bands between 5000 to 7000 feet" for consistency with other measurements, shouldn't it be 5,000 to 7,000, plus conversions?
- Fixed Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Other stuff
- No dab links
- Dupe links: firebombing; night fighter
- Fixed Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- External links all work
- Images appear to have appropriate tags
Will check back in a few. Cheers, Zawed ( talk) 01:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your review: I think that I've now addressed those comments. Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, looks good. Completing checklist below and passing as GA. Cheers, Zawed ( talk) 06:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Zawed ( talk · contribs) 06:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I'll do this one, comments to follow over next few days.
Zawed (
talk)
06:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Comments
Looks really good Nick, only two substantive points:
- Infobox: Shizuichi Tanaka is mentioned as a commander/leader but doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere in body of article.
- I've added him in a note. None of the sources mentions him as having played an active role in this battle, but he was the overall commander Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Departure section: "in bands between 5000 to 7000 feet" for consistency with other measurements, shouldn't it be 5,000 to 7,000, plus conversions?
- Fixed Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Other stuff
- No dab links
- Dupe links: firebombing; night fighter
- Fixed Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- External links all work
- Images appear to have appropriate tags
Will check back in a few. Cheers, Zawed ( talk) 01:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your review: I think that I've now addressed those comments. Nick-D ( talk) 04:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, looks good. Completing checklist below and passing as GA. Cheers, Zawed ( talk) 06:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section): b (citations to
reliable sources): c (
OR): d (
copyvio and
plagiarism):
- a (
reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects): b (
focused):
- a (
major aspects):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales): b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: