GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 20:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Will have this to you within a day or two ☯
Jag
uar ☯
20:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is a neat, compact article, worthy of becoming GA in my opinion. The only thing that stands in the way at the moment is that the lead could summarise the article better (to reach the GA criteria it has to act as a sort of "mini article") and also some minor prose issues that could be addressed. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days and will see what happens. Thanks! ☯ Jag uar ☯ 12:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick response, upon looking at the changes made this article now meets the GA criteria. Promoting ☯
Jag
uar ☯
16:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 20:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Will have this to you within a day or two ☯
Jag
uar ☯
20:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This is a neat, compact article, worthy of becoming GA in my opinion. The only thing that stands in the way at the moment is that the lead could summarise the article better (to reach the GA criteria it has to act as a sort of "mini article") and also some minor prose issues that could be addressed. I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days and will see what happens. Thanks! ☯ Jag uar ☯ 12:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick response, upon looking at the changes made this article now meets the GA criteria. Promoting ☯
Jag
uar ☯
16:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)