This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
For all the discussion, this is a weak article, and the mentions of Z. Licko's Filosofia read like a sponsored infomercial. Needs much work. No mention of early/late Bodoni, difference between Lange/Stone versions and others. Not a high quality article. Troneck ( talk) 22:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Troneck
I think it would be a good idea to state what Bodoni is. -- Ihope127 00:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
The line "Bodoni is easy and inviting to read" is rather misleading. At small point sizes, Bodoni seems to glitter on the page, as mentioned in the article. So, which one is it? Javguerre 02:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I put this back in because IBM do (have always?) use Bodonis in their print ads, especially for text in magazine inserts and outdoor. The well-known IBM logo is of course a typographic wordmark in a chunky slab serif style, but it's not the only public "face" of IBM. Text typography is a subtle and for some people subliminal part of corporate I.D.
Arbo
talk 15:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I am troubled to see such rash and aggressive editing with deletion of what is clearly a superior specimen. What's next Mr. Arboghast? Sowing NGAGAS' fields with salt? Must you slash and burn? None of us own any wiki article. I have tried to find a middle ground between the new contnet and old. As a professor of typography I do not se a problem with the new information, If you differ and can back it up, please edit, not revert and delete. CApitol3
"Bodoni is used in THX's early trailers like Broadway and Cimarron."
Does anyone have any clue what this is referring to? Was it perhaps meant to say 'Fox'? 203.220.212.117 ( talk) 09:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
For all the discussion, this is a weak article, and the mentions of Z. Licko's Filosofia read like a sponsored infomercial. Needs much work. No mention of early/late Bodoni, difference between Lange/Stone versions and others. Not a high quality article. Troneck ( talk) 22:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Troneck
I think it would be a good idea to state what Bodoni is. -- Ihope127 00:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
The line "Bodoni is easy and inviting to read" is rather misleading. At small point sizes, Bodoni seems to glitter on the page, as mentioned in the article. So, which one is it? Javguerre 02:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I put this back in because IBM do (have always?) use Bodonis in their print ads, especially for text in magazine inserts and outdoor. The well-known IBM logo is of course a typographic wordmark in a chunky slab serif style, but it's not the only public "face" of IBM. Text typography is a subtle and for some people subliminal part of corporate I.D.
Arbo
talk 15:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I am troubled to see such rash and aggressive editing with deletion of what is clearly a superior specimen. What's next Mr. Arboghast? Sowing NGAGAS' fields with salt? Must you slash and burn? None of us own any wiki article. I have tried to find a middle ground between the new contnet and old. As a professor of typography I do not se a problem with the new information, If you differ and can back it up, please edit, not revert and delete. CApitol3
"Bodoni is used in THX's early trailers like Broadway and Cimarron."
Does anyone have any clue what this is referring to? Was it perhaps meant to say 'Fox'? 203.220.212.117 ( talk) 09:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)