GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Ugog Nizdast ( talk · contribs) 14:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Nominator: Bhooshannpy at 10:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
I will be doing this review, since it's my first...I'll be assisted by a veteran user and may take some time. Hope that's okay, Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 14:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments
You don't have to go strictly according to what I've proposed above, it's just an outline on how to rearrange the content, do make your own changes as you see fit. I'm putting this review 'on hold' for seven days, if that is not enough please let me know and I'll extend it. I'm watching this article and page, also will make minor edits if needed. Once you finish or have any questions...tell me so that we can proceed. If you feel that you won't be able to do this within time for any reason, I can close this and you can always make these changes whenever you can so that you can renominate it later; I'll be happy to review it again. - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 17:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Article seems to be sourced well but needs to be re-done in terms of section arrangement and content trimming, only then I can check the remaining criteria.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Ugog Nizdast ( talk · contribs) 14:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Nominator: Bhooshannpy at 10:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
I will be doing this review, since it's my first...I'll be assisted by a veteran user and may take some time. Hope that's okay, Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 14:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments
You don't have to go strictly according to what I've proposed above, it's just an outline on how to rearrange the content, do make your own changes as you see fit. I'm putting this review 'on hold' for seven days, if that is not enough please let me know and I'll extend it. I'm watching this article and page, also will make minor edits if needed. Once you finish or have any questions...tell me so that we can proceed. If you feel that you won't be able to do this within time for any reason, I can close this and you can always make these changes whenever you can so that you can renominate it later; I'll be happy to review it again. - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 17:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Article seems to be sourced well but needs to be re-done in terms of section arrangement and content trimming, only then I can check the remaining criteria.