This article was nominated for deletion on 26 April 2022. The result of the discussion was Continue editorially.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rocks and minerals Low‑importance Bobdownsite is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Geology: Meteorites Low‑importance Talk:Bobdownsite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by the Meteorites task force (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Guesswho03721.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 14:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC) reply

In 2018 this mineral was found to be mis-analyzed and does not exist. 2600:1011:B064:5689:A107:1954:5470:5B92 ( talk) 23:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

If you can give us a reliable source, then it can be deleted. -- Kent G. Budge ( talk) 23:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC) reply

See: McCubbin, F.M. et al. (2018) "Discreditation of bobdownsite and the establishment of criteria for the identification of minerals with essential monofluorophosphate (PO3F2–)", American Mineralogist, volume 103, issue 8, pages 1319–1328, https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2018-6440 . GeoWriter ( talk) 14:01, 26 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Good, I'll put up the delete proposal. I do suggest adding a very brief mention of bobdownsite at Whitlockite as a discredited minerals species, with redirect, if only to prevent this article being resurrected in the future. -- Kent G. Budge ( talk) 15:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC) reply