From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bobby Berosini/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
This article completely misrepresents the whole Berosini situation. In the original trial, it came out that the reason the orangs were upset was because of deliberate antagonism by the complaining dancer and others, in order to get said video footage. I attended a talk by the investigating veterinarian that the USDA sent to do the initial investigation. He later testified for Berosini at the original trial. I don't know if my recollection of the talk is sufficient for editing the article though, and would like some guidance. I do remember that the so-called metal rod that was involved was actually a 14" wooden dowel wrapped in electrical tape. During the trial, the PETA lawyer while cross examining the veterinarian, asked him on the stand " How would you like it if you were hit with a 14" wooden dowel". The veterinarian replied that he didn't think it would hurt much at all, and invited the lawyer to hit him with one. The lawyer quickly changed the subject. Also, the revoking of his USDA license was completely uninvolved with the case or any abuse issues, and was reinstated later.

There is a good article here on the case

http://firebombpeta.blogspot.com/2005/01/story-of-bobby-berosini.html

Unfortunately the link to the original article is dead.

Last edited at 03:52, 21 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 09:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bobby Berosini/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
This article completely misrepresents the whole Berosini situation. In the original trial, it came out that the reason the orangs were upset was because of deliberate antagonism by the complaining dancer and others, in order to get said video footage. I attended a talk by the investigating veterinarian that the USDA sent to do the initial investigation. He later testified for Berosini at the original trial. I don't know if my recollection of the talk is sufficient for editing the article though, and would like some guidance. I do remember that the so-called metal rod that was involved was actually a 14" wooden dowel wrapped in electrical tape. During the trial, the PETA lawyer while cross examining the veterinarian, asked him on the stand " How would you like it if you were hit with a 14" wooden dowel". The veterinarian replied that he didn't think it would hurt much at all, and invited the lawyer to hit him with one. The lawyer quickly changed the subject. Also, the revoking of his USDA license was completely uninvolved with the case or any abuse issues, and was reinstated later.

There is a good article here on the case

http://firebombpeta.blogspot.com/2005/01/story-of-bobby-berosini.html

Unfortunately the link to the original article is dead.

Last edited at 03:52, 21 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 09:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook