This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The last thing I will ever do for wikipedia, and I have done a lot ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ortolan88), is to stick back in here a lot of stuff about blues ballads removed in a spate of condescending hypocrisy by a concern troll who doesn't want the world to know what a blues ballad is, or any examples of one:
Ironically, this guy's whole point, insofar as he has one, is encapsulated in the last point, which he has willfully obscured.
Goodbye,
Ortolan88 (
talk)
17:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
The present content of this entry has little to do with blues. It is a string of opinions and broad generalizations unsupported by anything. Ironically, it is meant to be a definition. Also, the writing style is by-an-academic-for-academics. What should be different? Like most art there is an ineffable quality to The Blues. Because it's a state of being it's mos' difficult to describe. It seems to me that a blues ballad is a blues song that contains a story.
AnuthaMule ( talk) 23:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blues ballad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The last thing I will ever do for wikipedia, and I have done a lot ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ortolan88), is to stick back in here a lot of stuff about blues ballads removed in a spate of condescending hypocrisy by a concern troll who doesn't want the world to know what a blues ballad is, or any examples of one:
Ironically, this guy's whole point, insofar as he has one, is encapsulated in the last point, which he has willfully obscured.
Goodbye,
Ortolan88 (
talk)
17:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
The present content of this entry has little to do with blues. It is a string of opinions and broad generalizations unsupported by anything. Ironically, it is meant to be a definition. Also, the writing style is by-an-academic-for-academics. What should be different? Like most art there is an ineffable quality to The Blues. Because it's a state of being it's mos' difficult to describe. It seems to me that a blues ballad is a blues song that contains a story.
AnuthaMule ( talk) 23:57, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Blues ballad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)