A fact from Blueford v. Arkansas appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 March 2018 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that in Blueford v. Arkansas, the US Supreme Court allowed a man to be retried on murder charges after a jury unanimously voted to acquit him of those same charges? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blueford v. Arkansas.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Might be useful to have an "Aftermath" section indicating what happened to Blueford following the Supreme Court's decision. Did he face retrial, and if so, what was the verdict? 2601:644:1:B7CB:D4C2:4BF9:ABEF:FEE2 ( talk) 06:04, 3 March 2018 (UTC) reply

I considered that, since it's easy enough to look up court records from the Arkansas online system, but I thought WP:BLP concerns, coupled with the fact that I could find no independent, secondary sources to cite to, overrode whatever value there was in mentioning the outcome of the case. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC) reply