This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
P!nk was at a wedding not a funeral in the video — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gbegg (
talk •
contribs) 09:52, 6 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Trying to fix the Certifications table
On the Certifications table, for the Mexico citation, it says that it is missing a title. The formatting is odd and I can't figure out how to do it the right way.
JIK1975 (
talk) 15:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on
Blow Me (One Last Kiss). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Blow Me (One Last Kiss). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
First time reviewing one of your articles in a while! --
K. Peake 20:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
The B-side is not sourced; if it is from one of the releases listed, then add a track listing section
The comma before the album's title should be the only one in the first sentence
The writing/production sentence should be the second sentence instead
"It was released as" → "The song was released as"
"after a demo version" → "shortly after a demo version"
"Musically, it is an" → "It is an"
"part of its instrumentation." → "part of the instrumentation."
Mention about the lyrical meaning of the song in a sentence after the above one
"positive reviews.
Music critics praised the track's production, lyrics" → "generally positive reviews from
music critics, who praised the production. Some complimented its lyrics"
Shouldn't the US position be mentioned first per Pink's nationality? If so, merge it with the commercially part instead
"topping the charts in" → "The song topped the charts in" if the other position is moved
"Scotland while peaking within the top ten" → "Scotland, while peaking within the top-10" per
MOS:NUM
"top-ten single on" → "top-10 single on"
Write out notable certifications like the ones in Australia and Canada after the chart positions
Remove "for "Blow Me (One Last Kiss)"" in the music video part since the accompaniment implies this
The video sourcing the above content won't play due to Adobe flash player no longer being supported; is this my laptop or does it not work in general?
Adobe is dead for good and for everyone, which is a major pain in the ass. I could replace the video sourcing with
a direct sourcing to the video, but the thing is that it won't get played on the
archived link. Haven't been able to find a YouTube alternative either. What should I do? -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 21:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)reply
If the first link is considered a reliable source, then use that for a replacement. --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Done
"developed from a" → "was developed from a"
"punk-rock friends"." → "punk-rock friends" while they sang along." per the source
"in one day." → "over the course of one day in 2012." to be specific
"considered titling the track" → "considered titling it"
"bracketed "One Last Kiss" to avoid" → "bracketed "One Last Kiss" to avoid a"
All Done except where noted
Composition and lyrical interpretation
Pipe chorus to
Refrain and rock to
Rock music on the audio sample text
Isn't "pushed forward" more appropriate than "pushed up"?
"on Pink's website" → "via Pink's website"
"the following day through" → "the following day, through"
"distributed it to" → "distributed the song to UK"
The release being delayed in the country is not mentioned by any of the sources
It is not mentioned, but it's kinda obvious, since nowhere else was the song released so late. Should I remove the sentence and just keep the info regarding the UK release? -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 20:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
No, keeping all of it should be fine actually since it's not OR when the following statement backs the sentence up.--
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
All Done except where noted
Critical reception
Place this below the release info in the section, starting at a para below; I think the img can be at the start of the section since it will still overlap with the first load of reviews and makes decreasing reception to two paras easier for flow
"received positive reviews from" → "was met with generally positive reviews from"
Pipe single to
Single (music) and remove the comma after the term
"Marc Hogan of Spin applauded the song's" → "Hogan applauded the song's"
"that it contained" → "that it contains"
Merge the second reviews para with the first one
I merged other reviews so the paragraphs would look somewhat equal -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 20:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
"rated the song" → "awarded a rating of"
"form and an" → "form, and an"
Remove excess space after "So What"
It is already clear that the song was being reviewed at the time of the album's release, so change the upon release part
"Writing for The Atlantic, Jonathan Bogart spotlighted" → "Bogart spotlighted"
Remove comma after 2004 song
Digital Spy should not be italicised
Add something like "In a mixed review," at the start of the last sentence to separate it somewhat, as the other reviews are positive
All Done
Commercial performance
Mention the digital sales the week of its debut per the source
"her 12th top-ten" → "her 12th top-10" per MOS:NUM
"at number one on the" → "at number one on the US"
Why are the refs not in corresponding order for the Mainstream Top 40, Adult Pop Songs and Dance Club Songs charts?
"peaked at number four and was certified 3× Platinum" → "peaked at number four, and was certified triple platinum"
Add MC in brackets for Music Canada
"of 240,000 units." → "of 240,000 units in Canada."
The Finland Download peak is not displayed by the source
This is the
link that the source should display, but it redirects to
this. What should I do? -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 17:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Add a ref for this chart instead of using the template and try to use an archive for the correct link; if this does not work, you might have to remove the chart which isn't too much of a problem due to it only being a download one. --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Done
Why is there an excess space after Honduras Top 50?
Make the rowspan of digital download 2 when there's that number of releases consecutively and do the same for contemporary hit radio
Not done Would you be able to do both of this for me? I've been trying to solve this over the past days but with absolut no result. -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 10:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I worked in the rowspan one for you, but can you do the centering yourself by looking at GA articles with the table to find the allignment? --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Wikilink
Billboard Brasil on ref 101 and cite as work/website instead for this and ref 102
WP:OVERLINK of Billboard on refs 117, 138, 142, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152 and 153
Not done this is the chart template, it shouldn't be a problem I guess, all Wiki pages have overlinked Billboard refs. Can't do anything about it. -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 14:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
It is overlinked on cases that are not part of the template, take the year-end charts refs for instance. --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Done
Fix the archive dates for refs 127, 135 and 136 for consistency
Ditto for refs 144 and 145, plus cite as publisher instead and fix WP:OVERLINK of Tophit
WP:OVERLINK of Official Charts Company on ref 146 and remove Official Charts
Remove wikilink on RCA Records for ref 158 and fix MOS:QWQ issues
All Done except where noted
Sources
Good
Final comments and verdict
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; took a few days to review because of work. --
K. Peake 09:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: Hi! Thank you very much for diving into this article. I hope I covered every suggestion and issue, except where noted. Please address some of the unclarities above and let me know if I missed something or if there's anything else I can do. Greets; -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 14:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Gabrielflorin01: Thank you for trying to work things in, I have left responses above! --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: Hello. Thanks for the help by the rowspan. I solved all the remaining issues as well. Please take a final look on the article. Greets; -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 17:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Gabrielflorin01:✓Pass now, nice fixes apart from you forgetting to unlink Billboard for the Mexico Ingles Airplay ref but I edited that one in for you! --
K. Peake 20:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
P!nk was at a wedding not a funeral in the video — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gbegg (
talk •
contribs) 09:52, 6 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Trying to fix the Certifications table
On the Certifications table, for the Mexico citation, it says that it is missing a title. The formatting is odd and I can't figure out how to do it the right way.
JIK1975 (
talk) 15:37, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on
Blow Me (One Last Kiss). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Blow Me (One Last Kiss). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
First time reviewing one of your articles in a while! --
K. Peake 20:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Infobox and lead
The B-side is not sourced; if it is from one of the releases listed, then add a track listing section
The comma before the album's title should be the only one in the first sentence
The writing/production sentence should be the second sentence instead
"It was released as" → "The song was released as"
"after a demo version" → "shortly after a demo version"
"Musically, it is an" → "It is an"
"part of its instrumentation." → "part of the instrumentation."
Mention about the lyrical meaning of the song in a sentence after the above one
"positive reviews.
Music critics praised the track's production, lyrics" → "generally positive reviews from
music critics, who praised the production. Some complimented its lyrics"
Shouldn't the US position be mentioned first per Pink's nationality? If so, merge it with the commercially part instead
"topping the charts in" → "The song topped the charts in" if the other position is moved
"Scotland while peaking within the top ten" → "Scotland, while peaking within the top-10" per
MOS:NUM
"top-ten single on" → "top-10 single on"
Write out notable certifications like the ones in Australia and Canada after the chart positions
Remove "for "Blow Me (One Last Kiss)"" in the music video part since the accompaniment implies this
The video sourcing the above content won't play due to Adobe flash player no longer being supported; is this my laptop or does it not work in general?
Adobe is dead for good and for everyone, which is a major pain in the ass. I could replace the video sourcing with
a direct sourcing to the video, but the thing is that it won't get played on the
archived link. Haven't been able to find a YouTube alternative either. What should I do? -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 21:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)reply
If the first link is considered a reliable source, then use that for a replacement. --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Done
"developed from a" → "was developed from a"
"punk-rock friends"." → "punk-rock friends" while they sang along." per the source
"in one day." → "over the course of one day in 2012." to be specific
"considered titling the track" → "considered titling it"
"bracketed "One Last Kiss" to avoid" → "bracketed "One Last Kiss" to avoid a"
All Done except where noted
Composition and lyrical interpretation
Pipe chorus to
Refrain and rock to
Rock music on the audio sample text
Isn't "pushed forward" more appropriate than "pushed up"?
"on Pink's website" → "via Pink's website"
"the following day through" → "the following day, through"
"distributed it to" → "distributed the song to UK"
The release being delayed in the country is not mentioned by any of the sources
It is not mentioned, but it's kinda obvious, since nowhere else was the song released so late. Should I remove the sentence and just keep the info regarding the UK release? -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 20:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
No, keeping all of it should be fine actually since it's not OR when the following statement backs the sentence up.--
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
All Done except where noted
Critical reception
Place this below the release info in the section, starting at a para below; I think the img can be at the start of the section since it will still overlap with the first load of reviews and makes decreasing reception to two paras easier for flow
"received positive reviews from" → "was met with generally positive reviews from"
Pipe single to
Single (music) and remove the comma after the term
"Marc Hogan of Spin applauded the song's" → "Hogan applauded the song's"
"that it contained" → "that it contains"
Merge the second reviews para with the first one
I merged other reviews so the paragraphs would look somewhat equal -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 20:19, 27 July 2021 (UTC)reply
"rated the song" → "awarded a rating of"
"form and an" → "form, and an"
Remove excess space after "So What"
It is already clear that the song was being reviewed at the time of the album's release, so change the upon release part
"Writing for The Atlantic, Jonathan Bogart spotlighted" → "Bogart spotlighted"
Remove comma after 2004 song
Digital Spy should not be italicised
Add something like "In a mixed review," at the start of the last sentence to separate it somewhat, as the other reviews are positive
All Done
Commercial performance
Mention the digital sales the week of its debut per the source
"her 12th top-ten" → "her 12th top-10" per MOS:NUM
"at number one on the" → "at number one on the US"
Why are the refs not in corresponding order for the Mainstream Top 40, Adult Pop Songs and Dance Club Songs charts?
"peaked at number four and was certified 3× Platinum" → "peaked at number four, and was certified triple platinum"
Add MC in brackets for Music Canada
"of 240,000 units." → "of 240,000 units in Canada."
The Finland Download peak is not displayed by the source
This is the
link that the source should display, but it redirects to
this. What should I do? -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 17:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Add a ref for this chart instead of using the template and try to use an archive for the correct link; if this does not work, you might have to remove the chart which isn't too much of a problem due to it only being a download one. --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Done
Why is there an excess space after Honduras Top 50?
Make the rowspan of digital download 2 when there's that number of releases consecutively and do the same for contemporary hit radio
Not done Would you be able to do both of this for me? I've been trying to solve this over the past days but with absolut no result. -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 10:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I worked in the rowspan one for you, but can you do the centering yourself by looking at GA articles with the table to find the allignment? --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Wikilink
Billboard Brasil on ref 101 and cite as work/website instead for this and ref 102
WP:OVERLINK of Billboard on refs 117, 138, 142, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152 and 153
Not done this is the chart template, it shouldn't be a problem I guess, all Wiki pages have overlinked Billboard refs. Can't do anything about it. -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 14:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
It is overlinked on cases that are not part of the template, take the year-end charts refs for instance. --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Done
Fix the archive dates for refs 127, 135 and 136 for consistency
Ditto for refs 144 and 145, plus cite as publisher instead and fix WP:OVERLINK of Tophit
WP:OVERLINK of Official Charts Company on ref 146 and remove Official Charts
Remove wikilink on RCA Records for ref 158 and fix MOS:QWQ issues
All Done except where noted
Sources
Good
Final comments and verdict
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; took a few days to review because of work. --
K. Peake 09:11, 26 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: Hi! Thank you very much for diving into this article. I hope I covered every suggestion and issue, except where noted. Please address some of the unclarities above and let me know if I missed something or if there's anything else I can do. Greets; -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 14:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Gabrielflorin01: Thank you for trying to work things in, I have left responses above! --
K. Peake 05:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Kyle Peake: Hello. Thanks for the help by the rowspan. I solved all the remaining issues as well. Please take a final look on the article. Greets; -
Gabrielflorin01 (
talk) 17:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Gabrielflorin01:✓Pass now, nice fixes apart from you forgetting to unlink Billboard for the Mexico Ingles Airplay ref but I edited that one in for you! --
K. Peake 20:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)reply