![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
[I'm coping this text from the discussion page of Second Bloody Valentine War, which can be seen as a sister page to this one, so the same should apply.]
I think this page should be an accurate chronology of the war. It should be narrated from a neutral point of view, something of a historical narration. As such, it should contain:
For every event there should be the date and the place. For the battles, there should be info about the battle itself, such as deployed units, rules of engagement and the outcome.
This page, on the other hand, SHOULD NOT contain any of the following:
Please feel free to add your point of view, so we can all put toghether a set of basic rules and compose a nicer page.
Thanks to all. [Note: This text is a edited copy from the talk page of Second Bloody Valentine War.]-- IgorTrieste 12:51, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Well, this page seems to be in a much better state than the Second Bloody Valentine War page. I would prefer if someone included some more specific information about what happened, though. [- Pkmatrix]
While looking through this article, I've noticed that while it's pretty good, it's lacking a bunch of easily obtainable details, along with more general background information on the war itself. I mean, pretty much every article I've read on Wikipedia has a section that talks about the causes in some depth...why doesn't this one? Thus, I'm going to be expanding the article a bit in the near future. If anyone has any problem with what I add, just say so and I'll explain my reasons for adding it. -- Pkmatrix 19:19, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
The name of Operation Uroboros may have been mistranslated, given that the correct spelling of the word is Oroboros (if this is the intended meaning). There may be appearances of the name written in the series, (I haven't checked), which would be the most correct source to follow. Of course, 'uroboros,' might be correct, but given the many different romanizations of names, the meaning may have been intended to be 'Oroboros,' and should be verified.
Does anyone know where the infos for the deployed forced come from? For me they look highly speculative (except the unique units of course). Diabound00 09:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
[I'm coping this text from the discussion page of Second Bloody Valentine War, which can be seen as a sister page to this one, so the same should apply.]
I think this page should be an accurate chronology of the war. It should be narrated from a neutral point of view, something of a historical narration. As such, it should contain:
For every event there should be the date and the place. For the battles, there should be info about the battle itself, such as deployed units, rules of engagement and the outcome.
This page, on the other hand, SHOULD NOT contain any of the following:
Please feel free to add your point of view, so we can all put toghether a set of basic rules and compose a nicer page.
Thanks to all. [Note: This text is a edited copy from the talk page of Second Bloody Valentine War.]-- IgorTrieste 12:51, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Well, this page seems to be in a much better state than the Second Bloody Valentine War page. I would prefer if someone included some more specific information about what happened, though. [- Pkmatrix]
While looking through this article, I've noticed that while it's pretty good, it's lacking a bunch of easily obtainable details, along with more general background information on the war itself. I mean, pretty much every article I've read on Wikipedia has a section that talks about the causes in some depth...why doesn't this one? Thus, I'm going to be expanding the article a bit in the near future. If anyone has any problem with what I add, just say so and I'll explain my reasons for adding it. -- Pkmatrix 19:19, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
The name of Operation Uroboros may have been mistranslated, given that the correct spelling of the word is Oroboros (if this is the intended meaning). There may be appearances of the name written in the series, (I haven't checked), which would be the most correct source to follow. Of course, 'uroboros,' might be correct, but given the many different romanizations of names, the meaning may have been intended to be 'Oroboros,' and should be verified.
Does anyone know where the infos for the deployed forced come from? For me they look highly speculative (except the unique units of course). Diabound00 09:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)