This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
Requested move 22 May 2015
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose the "(album)" redirect should point to the disambiguation page where both the EP and this album would be listed. The EP itself used to reside at the "album" location until yesterday
[1], when you moved it; so it shows that the community considers EPs as a type of album, thus the album location is ambiguous. --
65.94.43.89 (
talk)
03:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment your failure to fix the file page
[2] when you renamed the article is disappointing; if this move had gone through without the fix, there would be a big problem with the file facing deletion. --
65.94.43.89 (
talk)
04:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oops, sorry about this. Either way, the "community" should come to a decision now. IMO a dab page is also fine but not needed, since a hatnote in both articles will do the same job more easily. There are many pairs of studio album/EP articles on WP with the same title that are treated this way.--
MASHAUNIX05:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Since it is 24 min:35 long and has been at (album) from 2008 till yesterday I have put (album) back, but of course this new claimant means it now has to be at
Bloodwork (Wednesday 13 album). Additionally both of these albums are badly sourced and borderline notability.
In ictu oculi (
talk)
22:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
Requested move 22 May 2015
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose the "(album)" redirect should point to the disambiguation page where both the EP and this album would be listed. The EP itself used to reside at the "album" location until yesterday
[1], when you moved it; so it shows that the community considers EPs as a type of album, thus the album location is ambiguous. --
65.94.43.89 (
talk)
03:55, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment your failure to fix the file page
[2] when you renamed the article is disappointing; if this move had gone through without the fix, there would be a big problem with the file facing deletion. --
65.94.43.89 (
talk)
04:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Oops, sorry about this. Either way, the "community" should come to a decision now. IMO a dab page is also fine but not needed, since a hatnote in both articles will do the same job more easily. There are many pairs of studio album/EP articles on WP with the same title that are treated this way.--
MASHAUNIX05:17, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Since it is 24 min:35 long and has been at (album) from 2008 till yesterday I have put (album) back, but of course this new claimant means it now has to be at
Bloodwork (Wednesday 13 album). Additionally both of these albums are badly sourced and borderline notability.
In ictu oculi (
talk)
22:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.