![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Blood diamond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't expect Wikipedia to have a moral stance and say "this is bad", but I would appreciate if the article told, in some neutral way, why blood diamonds are a thing people don't like. Does it hurt people? Who? How? Could the article include citations like "This important UN person spoke about blood diamonds and declared that they were harmful in this and that way"; etc.
Right now the article just seems to assume that everyone knows that blood diamonds are bad and why they're bad, and just explains who does it and who fights against it.
2A01:CB00:B62:6500:9008:4F6D:11BE:E3EF ( talk) 21:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Blood diamond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:48, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
I don't expect Wikipedia to have a moral stance and say "this is bad", but I would appreciate if the article told, in some neutral way, why blood diamonds are a thing people don't like. Does it hurt people? Who? How? Could the article include citations like "This important UN person spoke about blood diamonds and declared that they were harmful in this and that way"; etc.
Right now the article just seems to assume that everyone knows that blood diamonds are bad and why they're bad, and just explains who does it and who fights against it.
2A01:CB00:B62:6500:9008:4F6D:11BE:E3EF ( talk) 21:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)