This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Blohm & Voss Ha 139 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
'They were really intended as mail planes for catapult operations from mailships.'
The Ha 139 was not launched by catapult. In the 1930s-40s, only small aircraft were launched by catapult, not 4-engined ones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.78.129 ( talk) 22:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Blohm & Voss Ha 139 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
'They were really intended as mail planes for catapult operations from mailships.'
The Ha 139 was not launched by catapult. In the 1930s-40s, only small aircraft were launched by catapult, not 4-engined ones. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.78.129 ( talk) 22:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)