This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
The contents of the Africana studies page were
merged into
Black studies on November 7, 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see
its talk page.
Question: What part of this article could/should be
spun out?
@
Daniel Power of God: I'm pulling this RfC for several reasons, including: (i) there is no indication that
WP:RFCBEFORE has been observed, let alone exhausted; (ii) this is a
WP:SPLIT matter, therefore
not appropriate for RfC. That is not to say that discussion may not continue: by all means discuss a split proposal, just not as an RfC. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 23:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Maybe a
third opinion first? Then if it becomes too confusing we can post to the relevant projects or noticeboards (if any).
jps (
talk) 01:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
About the
Third Opinion request: The request made at
Third Opinion has been removed (i.e. declined). Like all other moderated content
dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, Third Opinion requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. If an editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made
here. Note also that Third Opinion is not a help desk, but a dispute resolution venue. It's not apparent that there is even a dispute here. —
TransporterMan (
TALK) 22:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) (Not watching this page)reply
Why not just
WP:BEBOLD, Daniel, and spin out? Someone can always revert if they disagree.
jps (
talk) 01:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
The contents of the Africana studies page were
merged into
Black studies on November 7, 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see
its talk page.
Question: What part of this article could/should be
spun out?
@
Daniel Power of God: I'm pulling this RfC for several reasons, including: (i) there is no indication that
WP:RFCBEFORE has been observed, let alone exhausted; (ii) this is a
WP:SPLIT matter, therefore
not appropriate for RfC. That is not to say that discussion may not continue: by all means discuss a split proposal, just not as an RfC. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 23:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)reply
Maybe a
third opinion first? Then if it becomes too confusing we can post to the relevant projects or noticeboards (if any).
jps (
talk) 01:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)reply
About the
Third Opinion request: The request made at
Third Opinion has been removed (i.e. declined). Like all other moderated content
dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, Third Opinion requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. If an editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which are made
here. Note also that Third Opinion is not a help desk, but a dispute resolution venue. It's not apparent that there is even a dispute here. —
TransporterMan (
TALK) 22:44, 16 December 2021 (UTC) (Not watching this page)reply
Why not just
WP:BEBOLD, Daniel, and spin out? Someone can always revert if they disagree.
jps (
talk) 01:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)reply