| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Nominator: AryKun ( talk · contribs) 09:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reconrabbit ( talk · contribs) 18:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'll start working on this review. I have a subscription to BoW so at the very least I can verify from there. Good work on the rewrite; I'll give specific feedback when I find it's needed.
Recon
rabbit
18:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
though I made a small change to the wording on flock size. Summarizes the article's content well.
- Defining "clade" seems atypical of similar quality bird articles. The term is linked to a defining page anyway. Definition could be removed?
- (This might be an issue only because I can't verify Pigeons and Doves) does the species' vagrancy between these islands confirm they travel between New Ireland and New Britain or just suggest it?
- "The only known black imperial pigeon nest was found in January" January 1994? Also reflected in the top (lead) paragraph.
- "Lack of sufficient population decline" is an awkward construction but I don't immediately see how this could be said differently.
- "Generally common locally in mountainous regions" Locally may be extraneous?
- Appropriate layout according to MoS.
- No copyright violations stemming from references. Prose is markedly different from selected phrases in the referenced documents (BoW) behind a paywall. Google search is down on the copyright-checking tool for now. I believe it passes muster
- [8] in most places but I don't see a confirmation on "silver-tipped imperial pigeon" here or anywhere else on the web.
- [11]
- One image that depicts the species. Quality is okay. License is appropriate.
- Neutral POV in writing.
- There isn't a lot of information on the species that I could find, but the work done in writing the article appears thorough given the scarcity of reliable research.
- No edit wars going on now or in the past.
Good Article review progress box
|
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Nominator: AryKun ( talk · contribs) 09:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reconrabbit ( talk · contribs) 18:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'll start working on this review. I have a subscription to BoW so at the very least I can verify from there. Good work on the rewrite; I'll give specific feedback when I find it's needed.
Recon
rabbit
18:20, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- though I made a small change to the wording on flock size. Summarizes the article's content well.
- Defining "clade" seems atypical of similar quality bird articles. The term is linked to a defining page anyway. Definition could be removed?
- (This might be an issue only because I can't verify Pigeons and Doves) does the species' vagrancy between these islands confirm they travel between New Ireland and New Britain or just suggest it?
- "The only known black imperial pigeon nest was found in January" January 1994? Also reflected in the top (lead) paragraph.
- "Lack of sufficient population decline" is an awkward construction but I don't immediately see how this could be said differently.
- "Generally common locally in mountainous regions" Locally may be extraneous?
- Appropriate layout according to MoS.
- No copyright violations stemming from references. Prose is markedly different from selected phrases in the referenced documents (BoW) behind a paywall. Google search is down on the copyright-checking tool for now. I believe it passes muster
- [8] in most places but I don't see a confirmation on "silver-tipped imperial pigeon" here or anywhere else on the web.
- [11]
- One image that depicts the species. Quality is okay. License is appropriate.
- Neutral POV in writing.
- There isn't a lot of information on the species that I could find, but the work done in writing the article appears thorough given the scarcity of reliable research.
- No edit wars going on now or in the past.
Good Article review progress box
|