Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin ( talk · contribs) 10:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: Great and interesting article!-- GoP _T ^C _N 08:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply

   Pass/Fail:

   Until the nomination discussion of the lead images will be closed-- GoP _T ^C _N 10:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC) reply