This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Removed unnecessary notability tag. The article has two inline citations to a reputable third party source fully accepted by Wikipedia editors, albeit one which, in my opinion, is overrated. It doesn't have more inline citations becuase there is not much content to cite - but that doesn't mean the subject ain't notable.-- Technopat ( talk) 10:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
See Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. There are sufficient sources to demonstrate notability and probably to expand the article into something more useful than its current state. Bongo matic 12:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Black Note. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Removed unnecessary notability tag. The article has two inline citations to a reputable third party source fully accepted by Wikipedia editors, albeit one which, in my opinion, is overrated. It doesn't have more inline citations becuase there is not much content to cite - but that doesn't mean the subject ain't notable.-- Technopat ( talk) 10:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
See Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. There are sufficient sources to demonstrate notability and probably to expand the article into something more useful than its current state. Bongo matic 12:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Black Note. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)