Black Magic (Little Mix song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 15 May 2016. The result of the move review was Closure endorsed. |
It has been confirmed by both their label and several retailers in both Japan and Europe that it Will be released as a CD single as of tomorrow, July 24. Please do not change the format again. Christianofficial ( talk) 06:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 13 March 2016. The result of the move review was Endorsed. |
The result of the move request was: not moved. There is consensus that making the article title more ambiguous is not helpful to the reader. In ictu oculi has cited SONGDAB as a reason not to move, while the minority of supporters have not cited any policy or guideline in favor of moving. ( non-admin closure) Chase ( talk | contributions) 22:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Black Magic (Little Mix song) → Black Magic (song) – This is the only song called "Black Magic" to have an article on Wikipedia. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:D921:DFE4:B864:7C71 ( talk) 20:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
I added a chart succession box saying it was UK #1, but it was subsequently removed. The reason? As exactly quoted by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: "succession boxes have not been added to UK #1s since 2011." and "consensus needed to start again." (He/she has had a dodgy account history: /info/en/?search=User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars) How is it wrong to add a succession box for songs made in or after 2011? If the song was #1, it deserves a place in the history of #1s so users can easily navigate without looking up each #1 on their respective articles. You can check the Official Charts Company's website for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 00sClassicGamerFan ( talk • contribs) 08:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru ( talk) 17:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Black Magic (Little Mix song) →
Black Magic (song) – Move to the shorter title, per
WP:CONCISE, because we have no article on another song of the same name. Since the previous requested move a year ago,
an RFC on our article titles policy talk page found that songs and albums should take the more concise title (using only "song" as the disambiguator, not the artist name as well), and this move would be in conformance to that. While the previous close was confirmed at a
move review just a month ago, the reason why it was endorsed was because of timeliness (or a lack thereof), and not because the close was properly made.
Calidum
¤ 03:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Black Magic (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I'm planning to improve this article as much as possible for it to be nominated for a GA status. Currently, It has a B status and I think it already satisfies the criteria for a good article, but I will still try to improve the page for a higher chance to be accepted. If anyone is willing to help, that would be great. Thank you! GabbyMix01 ( talk) 08:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GhostRiver ( talk · contribs) 16:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
I'll be taking a look at this! —
Ghost
River 16:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Apologies for taking so long, I have been inundated with work and the holiday. Putting on hold now. — Ghost River 18:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Black Magic (Little Mix song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 15 May 2016. The result of the move review was Closure endorsed. |
It has been confirmed by both their label and several retailers in both Japan and Europe that it Will be released as a CD single as of tomorrow, July 24. Please do not change the format again. Christianofficial ( talk) 06:10, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 13 March 2016. The result of the move review was Endorsed. |
The result of the move request was: not moved. There is consensus that making the article title more ambiguous is not helpful to the reader. In ictu oculi has cited SONGDAB as a reason not to move, while the minority of supporters have not cited any policy or guideline in favor of moving. ( non-admin closure) Chase ( talk | contributions) 22:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Black Magic (Little Mix song) → Black Magic (song) – This is the only song called "Black Magic" to have an article on Wikipedia. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:D921:DFE4:B864:7C71 ( talk) 20:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
I added a chart succession box saying it was UK #1, but it was subsequently removed. The reason? As exactly quoted by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: "succession boxes have not been added to UK #1s since 2011." and "consensus needed to start again." (He/she has had a dodgy account history: /info/en/?search=User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars) How is it wrong to add a succession box for songs made in or after 2011? If the song was #1, it deserves a place in the history of #1s so users can easily navigate without looking up each #1 on their respective articles. You can check the Official Charts Company's website for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 00sClassicGamerFan ( talk • contribs) 08:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru ( talk) 17:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Black Magic (Little Mix song) →
Black Magic (song) – Move to the shorter title, per
WP:CONCISE, because we have no article on another song of the same name. Since the previous requested move a year ago,
an RFC on our article titles policy talk page found that songs and albums should take the more concise title (using only "song" as the disambiguator, not the artist name as well), and this move would be in conformance to that. While the previous close was confirmed at a
move review just a month ago, the reason why it was endorsed was because of timeliness (or a lack thereof), and not because the close was properly made.
Calidum
¤ 03:03, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Black Magic (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I'm planning to improve this article as much as possible for it to be nominated for a GA status. Currently, It has a B status and I think it already satisfies the criteria for a good article, but I will still try to improve the page for a higher chance to be accepted. If anyone is willing to help, that would be great. Thank you! GabbyMix01 ( talk) 08:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:23, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: GhostRiver ( talk · contribs) 16:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
I'll be taking a look at this! —
Ghost
River 16:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Apologies for taking so long, I have been inundated with work and the holiday. Putting on hold now. — Ghost River 18:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)