A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 13 dates. show |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have added this page on my watch list, and will revert any attempt to act like the in progress pogroms of Armenians is some unimportant footnote. I warn you NOW I will NOT be discriminating about whatever edits are made after an attempt to erase this information and its position, I will revert back to the last version where it is intact. If you want to make a change to that basic information, we can discuss it here. Changes of the type Grandmaster made are fine of course, but eliminating it from the start of the article is not acceptable, and is POV. I would appreciate any assistance from Azeris, Armenians and Chinese alike in helping to keep this in the article, where it belongs. -- RaffiKojian 03:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
User:Karabakh - please sign your comments with the --~~~~ so that your name is AUTOMATICALLY linked to your user page and people can tell that user Karabakh wrote something, rather than an anonymous user randomly said the word Karabakh at the end of their comment. Also, please do NOT remove information about Armenians without discussion (and not even mention it in your edit summaries!). You must know this is sensitive and should be discussed. It is currently still being discussed. GRANDMASTER - I agree that Yazov would be more likely to know the truth, but LOC would be more likely to say the truth... you know what I mean? But in any event, as I said, I think it likely the invasion was for just what he said, but that the pretext was the Armenian thing... -- RaffiKojian 12:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
The edit as of now works for me! -- RaffiKojian 13:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
I had a history professor who also agreed with GM's thesis although he referred to it during the Sumgait pogrom, not Baku. Here's an article by TIME on the event so give it a read (if you don't have a subscription, I'll e-mail the article) [4].-- MarshallBagramyan 01:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
In State of Emergency, in paragraph 2, it uses the term "Soviet Empire". While i have no problem with the idea that the U.S.S.R. was Imperialist, i would like to remind everyone that the official term is Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or C.C.C.P., or Soviet union informally. Unless anyone objects, i will change it to Soviet union on Monday the 21. -- Aristotle58 ( talk) 23:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Aristotle58 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristotle58 ( talk • contribs) 09:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
we need some pictures to be added to this page
Armenian political scientists acknowledge the fact that military force was used to prevent collapse of the USSR: Azerbaijan holds mourning events dedicated to the “hard times when the soviet troops entered Baku.” However they entered not to defend Armenians but to prevent collapse of the communist regime. Those victims Azerbaijan is speaking about were the people who wished to seize the power,” the political scientist underscored. From: http://www.yerkir.am/eng/?sub=news_arm&id=28580
This information should be corrected in the text. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 145.83.1.6 ( talk) 13:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC).
This article was completely unintelligible. I reverted back to a readable version. Sorry if I removed anything important. Rees11 ( talk)
I might be missing it but how many died during this event? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/ ([[User talk:-- Doom Child ( talk) 19:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)|talk]]) 04:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
HRW does not provide the exact number, just says it was over 100. [5] But the total death count is 132, from what I know. Grand master 07:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Tricolor, is there a reason you deleted the recently added text and adding "re-entered Armenian theme"? What is meant by "re-entering Armenian theme"? Tuscumbia ( talk) 14:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
I think Infobox historical event, which is used in Khojaly Massacre in particular, fits better than that for military conflict because, unlike Khojaly Massacre, BJ occurred under different circumstances. Or we can interchange them, placing military conflict into Khojaly Massacre and historical event into BJ. Thoughts? Brand t] 07:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
You cannot have it both ways: ignoring certain statements and misintepreting others. Based on what Gorbachev said, the intent was to preserve security and protect the population in response to pogroms against Armenians and the extremist activities by the nationalist bandits. It was the decree that said: "Extremist groups are organizing mass disorders fanning national enmity. They are committing bold criminal acts, mining roads and bridges, shelling settlements, taking hostages." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.230.178 ( talk) 23:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Nobody's misinterpreting any statements. Any educated person will understand that if the Soviet leadership has gone on civilian-killing rampage all over the Soviet Union (Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lithuania, Latvia) and countries of Warsaw Pact (Hungary, Czechoslovakia)
why did the Soviet leadership wait for so long
Human Rights Watch, a noble international human rights organization is not a "gospel"?
An image used in this article,
File:Independence1990.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 21:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC) |
I don't agree with this edit. I think that the image of the monument in Baku could be used in the article as the monument is described in the article, in the section about the monument. I don't see here any fail of NFCC. -- Interfase ( talk) 07:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Black January. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Black January. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2022 Kazakh unrest which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 13:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on 13 dates. show |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have added this page on my watch list, and will revert any attempt to act like the in progress pogroms of Armenians is some unimportant footnote. I warn you NOW I will NOT be discriminating about whatever edits are made after an attempt to erase this information and its position, I will revert back to the last version where it is intact. If you want to make a change to that basic information, we can discuss it here. Changes of the type Grandmaster made are fine of course, but eliminating it from the start of the article is not acceptable, and is POV. I would appreciate any assistance from Azeris, Armenians and Chinese alike in helping to keep this in the article, where it belongs. -- RaffiKojian 03:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
User:Karabakh - please sign your comments with the --~~~~ so that your name is AUTOMATICALLY linked to your user page and people can tell that user Karabakh wrote something, rather than an anonymous user randomly said the word Karabakh at the end of their comment. Also, please do NOT remove information about Armenians without discussion (and not even mention it in your edit summaries!). You must know this is sensitive and should be discussed. It is currently still being discussed. GRANDMASTER - I agree that Yazov would be more likely to know the truth, but LOC would be more likely to say the truth... you know what I mean? But in any event, as I said, I think it likely the invasion was for just what he said, but that the pretext was the Armenian thing... -- RaffiKojian 12:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
The edit as of now works for me! -- RaffiKojian 13:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
I had a history professor who also agreed with GM's thesis although he referred to it during the Sumgait pogrom, not Baku. Here's an article by TIME on the event so give it a read (if you don't have a subscription, I'll e-mail the article) [4].-- MarshallBagramyan 01:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
In State of Emergency, in paragraph 2, it uses the term "Soviet Empire". While i have no problem with the idea that the U.S.S.R. was Imperialist, i would like to remind everyone that the official term is Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or C.C.C.P., or Soviet union informally. Unless anyone objects, i will change it to Soviet union on Monday the 21. -- Aristotle58 ( talk) 23:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Aristotle58 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristotle58 ( talk • contribs) 09:03, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
we need some pictures to be added to this page
Armenian political scientists acknowledge the fact that military force was used to prevent collapse of the USSR: Azerbaijan holds mourning events dedicated to the “hard times when the soviet troops entered Baku.” However they entered not to defend Armenians but to prevent collapse of the communist regime. Those victims Azerbaijan is speaking about were the people who wished to seize the power,” the political scientist underscored. From: http://www.yerkir.am/eng/?sub=news_arm&id=28580
This information should be corrected in the text. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 145.83.1.6 ( talk) 13:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC).
This article was completely unintelligible. I reverted back to a readable version. Sorry if I removed anything important. Rees11 ( talk)
I might be missing it but how many died during this event? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Special:Contributions/ ([[User talk:-- Doom Child ( talk) 19:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)|talk]]) 04:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
HRW does not provide the exact number, just says it was over 100. [5] But the total death count is 132, from what I know. Grand master 07:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Tricolor, is there a reason you deleted the recently added text and adding "re-entered Armenian theme"? What is meant by "re-entering Armenian theme"? Tuscumbia ( talk) 14:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
I think Infobox historical event, which is used in Khojaly Massacre in particular, fits better than that for military conflict because, unlike Khojaly Massacre, BJ occurred under different circumstances. Or we can interchange them, placing military conflict into Khojaly Massacre and historical event into BJ. Thoughts? Brand t] 07:41, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
You cannot have it both ways: ignoring certain statements and misintepreting others. Based on what Gorbachev said, the intent was to preserve security and protect the population in response to pogroms against Armenians and the extremist activities by the nationalist bandits. It was the decree that said: "Extremist groups are organizing mass disorders fanning national enmity. They are committing bold criminal acts, mining roads and bridges, shelling settlements, taking hostages." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.191.230.178 ( talk) 23:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Nobody's misinterpreting any statements. Any educated person will understand that if the Soviet leadership has gone on civilian-killing rampage all over the Soviet Union (Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lithuania, Latvia) and countries of Warsaw Pact (Hungary, Czechoslovakia)
why did the Soviet leadership wait for so long
Human Rights Watch, a noble international human rights organization is not a "gospel"?
An image used in this article,
File:Independence1990.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 21:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC) |
I don't agree with this edit. I think that the image of the monument in Baku could be used in the article as the monument is described in the article, in the section about the monument. I don't see here any fail of NFCC. -- Interfase ( talk) 07:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Black January. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:53, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Black January. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:2022 Kazakh unrest which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 13:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)