![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
MAngelina, BJWT is not accredited by the Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries. Please stop replacing this (reliably) sourced information with a WP:SELFPUB source from the foundation's own website. Thanks. Sro23 ( talk) 16:21, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Sro23 There is no legal definition of a “sanctuary” in Mexico. Black Jaguar White Tiger is registered as a “Zoological Entertainment Facility.” ( source) Therefore it is not correct to use the term Sanctuary in the article.Please stop revising the article to include that term. Avanoire ( talk) 10:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Sro23 Thank you & I understand that you are trying to keep the article relevant and factual. But the most interesting part in this story is the controversy surrounding the organization and the CEO and the role social media played in that story. I feel that the article needs to cover that. If not it’s just about a rich guy with some big cats and an Instagram account.
The wikipedia page relies heavily on the organizations and it's founders claims on their website. Those claims are obviously self-serving and promotional and they have been questioned and critized by other organizations, journalists and bloggers. But those critical perspectives are removed by user @Sro23 and the page is reverted back to being a summary of the organizations claims. Avanoire ( talk) 14:14, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
MAngelina, BJWT is not accredited by the Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries. Please stop replacing this (reliably) sourced information with a WP:SELFPUB source from the foundation's own website. Thanks. Sro23 ( talk) 16:21, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Sro23 There is no legal definition of a “sanctuary” in Mexico. Black Jaguar White Tiger is registered as a “Zoological Entertainment Facility.” ( source) Therefore it is not correct to use the term Sanctuary in the article.Please stop revising the article to include that term. Avanoire ( talk) 10:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Sro23 Thank you & I understand that you are trying to keep the article relevant and factual. But the most interesting part in this story is the controversy surrounding the organization and the CEO and the role social media played in that story. I feel that the article needs to cover that. If not it’s just about a rich guy with some big cats and an Instagram account.
The wikipedia page relies heavily on the organizations and it's founders claims on their website. Those claims are obviously self-serving and promotional and they have been questioned and critized by other organizations, journalists and bloggers. But those critical perspectives are removed by user @Sro23 and the page is reverted back to being a summary of the organizations claims. Avanoire ( talk) 14:14, 9 January 2022 (UTC)