This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Black Iris (painting) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm removing the formal analysis section as original research. The citation is to Page 21 of O'Keefe's O'Keefes : the artist's collection by Barbara Buhler Lynes and Russell Bowman which states: "Seldom did O'Keeffe make more clear her belief in the inner vitalism of nature and her association of this form with light" when referring to Jack-in-the-Pulpit No. IV (CR 718). The rest of the analysis is unsourced. Mduvekot ( talk) 18:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Large blocks of content have been removed by your edits, Missjord. As I mentioned on your talk page, you are removing content that are widely held opinions. If you wish to present an alternate opinion, the best tack to take is to add content that shows that there are multiple viewpoints.
Please also be aware that by returning your edits and not engaging in conversation is an WP:EDITWAR for which you can be blocked if you do it three times.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 01:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Black Iris (painting) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm removing the formal analysis section as original research. The citation is to Page 21 of O'Keefe's O'Keefes : the artist's collection by Barbara Buhler Lynes and Russell Bowman which states: "Seldom did O'Keeffe make more clear her belief in the inner vitalism of nature and her association of this form with light" when referring to Jack-in-the-Pulpit No. IV (CR 718). The rest of the analysis is unsourced. Mduvekot ( talk) 18:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Large blocks of content have been removed by your edits, Missjord. As I mentioned on your talk page, you are removing content that are widely held opinions. If you wish to present an alternate opinion, the best tack to take is to add content that shows that there are multiple viewpoints.
Please also be aware that by returning your edits and not engaging in conversation is an WP:EDITWAR for which you can be blocked if you do it three times.– CaroleHenson ( talk) 01:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)