This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was wondering whether we actually needed the 'also see' section at the bottom of this article. There are already links to the author's page within the text and the infobox, so that particular link seems a little unnecessary. The other books in the series are also listed on the author's page, and of course if you follow the infobox through it is possible to go through all the books in the series because it links to previous and next books in the series. Would it be acceptable to remove this section as a little surplus to requirements? What do others think? Silverthorn 08:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Do we have a link or citation to support this statement in the Trivia section? It may well be correct, but it seems safer to be able to provide evidence in case it gets challenged. Silverthorn 10:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Why is it that the plot summary of this book is less detailed than those of the following books? Usually it's the other way around. Anyway, the plot summary should be similarly lengthened. ZFT ( talk) 07:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bitten (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I was wondering whether we actually needed the 'also see' section at the bottom of this article. There are already links to the author's page within the text and the infobox, so that particular link seems a little unnecessary. The other books in the series are also listed on the author's page, and of course if you follow the infobox through it is possible to go through all the books in the series because it links to previous and next books in the series. Would it be acceptable to remove this section as a little surplus to requirements? What do others think? Silverthorn 08:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Do we have a link or citation to support this statement in the Trivia section? It may well be correct, but it seems safer to be able to provide evidence in case it gets challenged. Silverthorn 10:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Why is it that the plot summary of this book is less detailed than those of the following books? Usually it's the other way around. Anyway, the plot summary should be similarly lengthened. ZFT ( talk) 07:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bitten (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)