This article was nominated for deletion on 21 October 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Novels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

We are currently linking a reference to the character "The Emperor" to the historical figure Emperor Norton. Does Moore explicitly make this connection? The character is quite clearly referencing the person, but to my recollection (it has been a while since I read the first two and I am only now getting around to this one) they are associated by implication only. FiveColourMap ( talk) 17:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC) reply

The only connection is the name. Or to be more accurate, the word "Emperor." This is dumb. 172.58.41.18 ( talk) 01:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC) reply