This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
i think bitch should be spelled lower case Bitch >> bitch and that it should be reffered to as simply as Bitch and not Bitch magazene in the thumb image boxes Qrc2006 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Does the current article strike anyone else as sounding far too much like a promotional summary? Crito2161 02:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The book cited as a reference is not independent of the subject. VegetativePup ( talk) 02:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Here's a number of secondary sources that could be included. I'm removing this as a candidate for deletion. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/09/03/andi_zeisler_and_lisa_jervis/ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/magazine/06wwln_q4.html http://articles.sfgate.com/2006-08-20/books/17308903_1_pop-culture-social-change-anthology http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=feminist_media_in_a_time_of_economic_trouble http://eastbaymonthly.com/kilduff-02-07.html http://motherjones.com/politics/1998/01/lewinsky-affair http://www.msmagazine.com/winter2004/thirdwave.asp
-- 75.148.87.230 ( talk) 18:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Currently the only footnote in the "Mission Statement" section, is footnote [6] which says [quote! from the wikitext]:
"<ref>an email from Jaymee Jacoby</ref>"
. Is it me, or does that seem a bit strange, for a source for a footnote in a
Wikipedia article? It does not even give the [time and] date of the e-mail message. It does specify the sender, and the recipient is probably not necessary to document -- (I guess.) Just my 0.02; Any comments? --
97.124.112.237 (
talk) 07:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure but is this the same magazine as bitchmedia.org?
If so I suspect the currently listed URL (bitchmagazine.org) is wrong.
Please advise. ~ 99.146.242.37 ( talk) 11:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
i think bitch should be spelled lower case Bitch >> bitch and that it should be reffered to as simply as Bitch and not Bitch magazene in the thumb image boxes Qrc2006 02:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Does the current article strike anyone else as sounding far too much like a promotional summary? Crito2161 02:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The book cited as a reference is not independent of the subject. VegetativePup ( talk) 02:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Here's a number of secondary sources that could be included. I'm removing this as a candidate for deletion. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2006/09/03/andi_zeisler_and_lisa_jervis/ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/06/magazine/06wwln_q4.html http://articles.sfgate.com/2006-08-20/books/17308903_1_pop-culture-social-change-anthology http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=feminist_media_in_a_time_of_economic_trouble http://eastbaymonthly.com/kilduff-02-07.html http://motherjones.com/politics/1998/01/lewinsky-affair http://www.msmagazine.com/winter2004/thirdwave.asp
-- 75.148.87.230 ( talk) 18:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Currently the only footnote in the "Mission Statement" section, is footnote [6] which says [quote! from the wikitext]:
"<ref>an email from Jaymee Jacoby</ref>"
. Is it me, or does that seem a bit strange, for a source for a footnote in a
Wikipedia article? It does not even give the [time and] date of the e-mail message. It does specify the sender, and the recipient is probably not necessary to document -- (I guess.) Just my 0.02; Any comments? --
97.124.112.237 (
talk) 07:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure but is this the same magazine as bitchmedia.org?
If so I suspect the currently listed URL (bitchmagazine.org) is wrong.
Please advise. ~ 99.146.242.37 ( talk) 11:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)