From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Molecule(s) not correct?

The 2D molecule on the page does not correspond to the imagine in the pihkal entry. If I am correct, the former is a 1,2,4,5 configuration of some sort and the latter is a 1,3,4,6, if I remember my Benzene ring correctly. Having said that, it appears that the image in the external entry is in fact the incorrect one. In any case they look different, or perhaps I am just too high and not seeing something obvious? -- Kst447 ( talk) 02:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC) reply

The molecules are perfectly correct. See arene substitution patterns article for more information. -- Harbinary ( talk) 10:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Molecule(s) not correct?

The 2D molecule on the page does not correspond to the imagine in the pihkal entry. If I am correct, the former is a 1,2,4,5 configuration of some sort and the latter is a 1,3,4,6, if I remember my Benzene ring correctly. Having said that, it appears that the image in the external entry is in fact the incorrect one. In any case they look different, or perhaps I am just too high and not seeing something obvious? -- Kst447 ( talk) 02:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC) reply

The molecules are perfectly correct. See arene substitution patterns article for more information. -- Harbinary ( talk) 10:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook