This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the point of this article? It seems likely to lead to confusion, given the many other articles that exist on Birkenhead, Wirral, etc.. The fact that one organisation uses this as a statistical area does not justify the creation of a new (and very poorly explained) article. Views? Ghmyrtle ( talk) 10:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
"Census tracts, abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.". The article also only has one source. I'm thinking about proposing a merge into Birkenhead. Orange sticker ( talk) 15:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Birkenhead has a population of 80k plus. And the wider borough of Wirral is partly in that area. Yes articles can be made for them as if they are identified in the urban area england article. Then they can have their own pages. They are simply covering urban areas. There's no confusion. And the link on there again is reliable they are built up areas not sub division built up areas. I seriously don't see your problem. And no it's not a case of fewer articles. Its more articles. Each article covers built up areas. If I made an article for example Durham it would be deleted as there is no urban area. However I made one for Accrington and rossendale and they are urbanised areas. The same with Burnley and Pendle. And Telford and Rhyl which are urban areas. There's no difference in defenitions. As they are just covering an urban area. The gender make up ethnicity and religious make up. They help to identify buas which are linked in the list of urban areas in England article. They form important centres of economic and growth. Teesside Blackpool and Bristol are some examples they are urban areas and towns and cities. They have built up area articles. So I make articles which are based on bua maps. The website is reliable as it recorded the population in 2011 census and the identified urban areas like Greater Nottingham Sheffield and Rotherham and Sunderland urban areas. RailwayJG ( talk) 12:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
And Birkenhead urban area RailwayJG ( talk) 12:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you John for your input and I agree with you RailwayJG ( talk) 17:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Is there a discussion somewhere where it was decided this shouldn't be merged to Birkenhead where it's already mentioned? I get that it covers other places but that isn't a reason not to incorporate it in another article. I don't see this article growing to become anything other than a few sentences describing the bounds of ONS-generated area and regurgitating some census data.---- Pontificalibus 16:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the point of this article? It seems likely to lead to confusion, given the many other articles that exist on Birkenhead, Wirral, etc.. The fact that one organisation uses this as a statistical area does not justify the creation of a new (and very poorly explained) article. Views? Ghmyrtle ( talk) 10:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
"Census tracts, abadi, and other areas not commonly recognized as a place (such as the area in an irrigation district) are not presumed to be notable.". The article also only has one source. I'm thinking about proposing a merge into Birkenhead. Orange sticker ( talk) 15:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Birkenhead has a population of 80k plus. And the wider borough of Wirral is partly in that area. Yes articles can be made for them as if they are identified in the urban area england article. Then they can have their own pages. They are simply covering urban areas. There's no confusion. And the link on there again is reliable they are built up areas not sub division built up areas. I seriously don't see your problem. And no it's not a case of fewer articles. Its more articles. Each article covers built up areas. If I made an article for example Durham it would be deleted as there is no urban area. However I made one for Accrington and rossendale and they are urbanised areas. The same with Burnley and Pendle. And Telford and Rhyl which are urban areas. There's no difference in defenitions. As they are just covering an urban area. The gender make up ethnicity and religious make up. They help to identify buas which are linked in the list of urban areas in England article. They form important centres of economic and growth. Teesside Blackpool and Bristol are some examples they are urban areas and towns and cities. They have built up area articles. So I make articles which are based on bua maps. The website is reliable as it recorded the population in 2011 census and the identified urban areas like Greater Nottingham Sheffield and Rotherham and Sunderland urban areas. RailwayJG ( talk) 12:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
And Birkenhead urban area RailwayJG ( talk) 12:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you John for your input and I agree with you RailwayJG ( talk) 17:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Is there a discussion somewhere where it was decided this shouldn't be merged to Birkenhead where it's already mentioned? I get that it covers other places but that isn't a reason not to incorporate it in another article. I don't see this article growing to become anything other than a few sentences describing the bounds of ONS-generated area and regurgitating some census data.---- Pontificalibus 16:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)