This article is about wild life. It is not about politics. The article started by the title Biodiversity in Israel Palestine.
But some one re-directed it Biodiversity in Israel
Wild life knows no boundaries, and the wild life in this region is unique.
The piece of land in question has many names and is disputed by two people fighting. some call it Israel, others Palestine, and so on.
So I hope this title will "Holy Land' wil be the least politically charged one and we do not see more re-directs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thameen ( talk • contribs) 19:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
You have a relatively new Wikipedian, a Palestinian (now now, stop scowling), who only wanted to do an article on ecology and nature in his country and wished that it not be politicized. He even called it "Israel/Palestine" and not "Palestine" or "Palestine/Israel". I for one hope that there is still a shred of decency left among us older editors who do not need to see everything politicized just for the sake of standing out to look 'authoritative'. Moshe already took out the map of the 'holy land', saying it was contentious, even though nobody disputes that this is the Holy Land. So in short, this wailing about a very nice and non-political article is extremely disappointing to me. The land is too small to have Biodiversity-type articles about every separate political enclave as is being proposed, and the only problem with this article is, in my opinion, unnecessary harassment of the original author of this piece (dare I guess why?). Work on on, add to it, enhance it, but please don't politicize it as that would be disgraceful. Ramallite (talk) 13:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was move. Oh, this is going to be fun moving all these articles... -- tariqabjotu 02:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
PageName → Biodiversity in Israel, West Bank, and Gaza Strip — NPOV, there is no such entity as "Palestine" at the moment, but the West Bank and Gaza Strip cover all areas where it might one day be. Tewfik Talk 00:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
If this article should exists at all, then tell me why. List of biodiversity topics includes only two articles on regional biodiversity: Biodiversity of New Caledonia and Biodiversity of New Zealand. In both cases, articles exist because biodiversity is highly unusual in those places. I am not aware of anything unique about biodiversity in Israel. Beit Or 20:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Just to cool heads here a little, I think we should change the designation to Disputed Territories and so it won't have either political overtone. We cannot call it Palestine because that term is too loaded an not encyclopedic. Valley2city 18:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Mount Hermon is not in Israel, the West Bank, or the Gaza Strip. It was presented in the article as if it was in Israel, but the mountain is completely within Syria and Lebanon. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 15:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Biodiversity in Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is about wild life. It is not about politics. The article started by the title Biodiversity in Israel Palestine.
But some one re-directed it Biodiversity in Israel
Wild life knows no boundaries, and the wild life in this region is unique.
The piece of land in question has many names and is disputed by two people fighting. some call it Israel, others Palestine, and so on.
So I hope this title will "Holy Land' wil be the least politically charged one and we do not see more re-directs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thameen ( talk • contribs) 19:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
You have a relatively new Wikipedian, a Palestinian (now now, stop scowling), who only wanted to do an article on ecology and nature in his country and wished that it not be politicized. He even called it "Israel/Palestine" and not "Palestine" or "Palestine/Israel". I for one hope that there is still a shred of decency left among us older editors who do not need to see everything politicized just for the sake of standing out to look 'authoritative'. Moshe already took out the map of the 'holy land', saying it was contentious, even though nobody disputes that this is the Holy Land. So in short, this wailing about a very nice and non-political article is extremely disappointing to me. The land is too small to have Biodiversity-type articles about every separate political enclave as is being proposed, and the only problem with this article is, in my opinion, unnecessary harassment of the original author of this piece (dare I guess why?). Work on on, add to it, enhance it, but please don't politicize it as that would be disgraceful. Ramallite (talk) 13:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was move. Oh, this is going to be fun moving all these articles... -- tariqabjotu 02:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
PageName → Biodiversity in Israel, West Bank, and Gaza Strip — NPOV, there is no such entity as "Palestine" at the moment, but the West Bank and Gaza Strip cover all areas where it might one day be. Tewfik Talk 00:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
If this article should exists at all, then tell me why. List of biodiversity topics includes only two articles on regional biodiversity: Biodiversity of New Caledonia and Biodiversity of New Zealand. In both cases, articles exist because biodiversity is highly unusual in those places. I am not aware of anything unique about biodiversity in Israel. Beit Or 20:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Just to cool heads here a little, I think we should change the designation to Disputed Territories and so it won't have either political overtone. We cannot call it Palestine because that term is too loaded an not encyclopedic. Valley2city 18:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Mount Hermon is not in Israel, the West Bank, or the Gaza Strip. It was presented in the article as if it was in Israel, but the mountain is completely within Syria and Lebanon. -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 15:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Biodiversity in Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)