| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Binciola article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Gbook hits:
- "Binciola" (86)
- "Binčola" (8)
@ Director: Did you even care to review the name before reverting with the comment "Rollback known-to-be-opposed, unilateral, non-consensus move."-- Zoupan 13:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Reverted once again (14:01), without discussing the above fact.-- Zoupan 14:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- I investigated your source and I agree with your addition of the "Name" section (even though its WP:NONENG...); as for the rest, I think we should discuss the topic in a more general venue. I propose your talkpage, if that's alright. --
Director (
talk) 14:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
-
Category talk:Ragusan noble families for the topic, but at this page we are discussing this particular article. Why wouldn't you support a move (or rather, revert) to Binciola?--
Zoupan 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- (Replied at Category talk:Ragusan noble families.) -- Director ( talk) 16:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
-
Category talk:Ragusan noble families for the topic, but at this page we are discussing this particular article. Why wouldn't you support a move (or rather, revert) to Binciola?--
Zoupan 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- I investigated your source and I agree with your addition of the "Name" section (even though its WP:NONENG...); as for the rest, I think we should discuss the topic in a more general venue. I propose your talkpage, if that's alright. --
Director (
talk) 14:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Binciola article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Gbook hits:
- "Binciola" (86)
- "Binčola" (8)
@ Director: Did you even care to review the name before reverting with the comment "Rollback known-to-be-opposed, unilateral, non-consensus move."-- Zoupan 13:51, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- Reverted once again (14:01), without discussing the above fact.-- Zoupan 14:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- I investigated your source and I agree with your addition of the "Name" section (even though its WP:NONENG...); as for the rest, I think we should discuss the topic in a more general venue. I propose your talkpage, if that's alright. --
Director (
talk) 14:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
-
Category talk:Ragusan noble families for the topic, but at this page we are discussing this particular article. Why wouldn't you support a move (or rather, revert) to Binciola?--
Zoupan 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- (Replied at Category talk:Ragusan noble families.) -- Director ( talk) 16:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
-
Category talk:Ragusan noble families for the topic, but at this page we are discussing this particular article. Why wouldn't you support a move (or rather, revert) to Binciola?--
Zoupan 14:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- I investigated your source and I agree with your addition of the "Name" section (even though its WP:NONENG...); as for the rest, I think we should discuss the topic in a more general venue. I propose your talkpage, if that's alright. --
Director (
talk) 14:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)