From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Tone

This article is incredibly tonally inconsistent, especially in the image captions. I am not knowledgeable enough on the environmental impact of bowfishing enough to have a stance on it, but I can't imagine it's bad enough to say that "one night of bowfishing resulted in over 2,500 lifeyears taken". That seems overly malicious. Voynich42 ( talk) 14:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Also, it seems misleading to call the species "vulnerable" in the first sentence, when that clashes with the IUCN rating while using the same terminology as that scale. Voynich42 ( talk) 14:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Tone

This article is incredibly tonally inconsistent, especially in the image captions. I am not knowledgeable enough on the environmental impact of bowfishing enough to have a stance on it, but I can't imagine it's bad enough to say that "one night of bowfishing resulted in over 2,500 lifeyears taken". That seems overly malicious. Voynich42 ( talk) 14:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Also, it seems misleading to call the species "vulnerable" in the first sentence, when that clashes with the IUCN rating while using the same terminology as that scale. Voynich42 ( talk) 14:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook