This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Washington Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance). Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi everyone!

I just wanted to tell you that the reason I deleted the deletion tag was because I wasn't finished adding information to the article. It is rather difficult to write it out completely when my laptop could crash at any given moment in the day. (It was funny how one day it crashed eight times within one hour's time!) ...I could fix my laptop, but I have way too many applications and softwares downloaded that it would be to much trouble to re-download them; instead, I save the article as I go along and update it constantly within one hour's time. :)

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdorableFluttershy ( talk • contribs) 09:53, 6 April 2013‎ (UTC) reply

Sorry, i didn`t see you haven`t finished the article. In that situation you can use {{ inuse}} or {{ Under construction}} templates. Than we can see that this article is being edited. -- DJ EV ( talk) 11:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC) reply

• https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/paleoclimatology-data/datasets/tree-ring
• https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo/f?p=517:1:0:::APP:PROXYDATASETLIST:18
  

7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I have serious doubts that the subject has enough in depth coverage from reliable secondary sources to ring the WP:N bell. To the extent that it has garnered coverage it has been mostly regional or local and almost entirely centered on the tree's death. This raises WP:1E issues. At the moment it looks like this article is unlikely to become much more than a glorified stub. Perhaps it should be merged into Gifford Pinchot National Forest. Thoughts? - Ad Orientem ( talk) 21:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC) reply

It is notable because of the tree's size. This article's text could be expanded using the existing sources. But that can be done if it is merged. Where it winds up makes no difference to me. I can't speak for the other contributors. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 02:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply