From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Project ratings

Article rated Stub class because it needs cleanup/wikification, more content and referencing. I think it's "Mid" importance because of the subject's connection to how the province was governed. PKT ( talk) 20:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Article has now been redirected, in which case importance=NA (non-article). PK T(alk) 16:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC) reply

What's with the talk of BC and BC rale sale/current scandal?? Nothing to do with the main article... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.235.130.139 ( talk) 00:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Project ratings

Article rated Stub class because it needs cleanup/wikification, more content and referencing. I think it's "Mid" importance because of the subject's connection to how the province was governed. PKT ( talk) 20:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Article has now been redirected, in which case importance=NA (non-article). PK T(alk) 16:18, 9 April 2012 (UTC) reply

What's with the talk of BC and BC rale sale/current scandal?? Nothing to do with the main article... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.235.130.139 ( talk) 00:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook