![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Keep. What is the rationale for deleting a carefully selected list of information about a hiking area? I would like to revert this. Ancheta Wis 03:38, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
There was a {{delete}} notice with the contents of the article overwritten. This is contrary to the instructions on the Speedy deletion policy page.
To the contributor: please explain your rationale for overwriting the contents of this page. Ancheta Wis 03:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This is the only symilar page in all the project. It's very usual to indicate related bibliography at the end of an article, but never there are "articles" considered themself as only bibliography. There are articles about books. Speaking about these books, but there are'n pages like this. If the bibliography isn't enought important for being at the end of a page then it means that it isn't escencial and then the page is not encylopaedical and deletable. We could write hundreds of thounsands of "articles" about bibliography but there are other projects in the net that do this.
This seems to have morphed into a generic list of Sierra-related books, not just guidebooks (nobody considers Jepson a "guidebook" :-) ), should perhaps be renamed to List of books about the Sierra Nevada. Stan 01:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed many books written about the Sierra Nevada state the false premise that Yosemite was a Miwok area, but it was not. Yosemite was a Paiute area and both the Miwoks and Paiutes were enemies and not trading partners until 1870 [1]. Yosemite Indian 4:08, 5 Jan 2008 (UTC)
The recent afd has a good side effect of bringing out suggestions for article improvement:
hike395 ( talk) 04:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Some lists of books have been added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. You can find the discussions here. RockMagnetist ( talk) 23:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Keep. What is the rationale for deleting a carefully selected list of information about a hiking area? I would like to revert this. Ancheta Wis 03:38, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
There was a {{delete}} notice with the contents of the article overwritten. This is contrary to the instructions on the Speedy deletion policy page.
To the contributor: please explain your rationale for overwriting the contents of this page. Ancheta Wis 03:52, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This is the only symilar page in all the project. It's very usual to indicate related bibliography at the end of an article, but never there are "articles" considered themself as only bibliography. There are articles about books. Speaking about these books, but there are'n pages like this. If the bibliography isn't enought important for being at the end of a page then it means that it isn't escencial and then the page is not encylopaedical and deletable. We could write hundreds of thounsands of "articles" about bibliography but there are other projects in the net that do this.
This seems to have morphed into a generic list of Sierra-related books, not just guidebooks (nobody considers Jepson a "guidebook" :-) ), should perhaps be renamed to List of books about the Sierra Nevada. Stan 01:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
I noticed many books written about the Sierra Nevada state the false premise that Yosemite was a Miwok area, but it was not. Yosemite was a Paiute area and both the Miwoks and Paiutes were enemies and not trading partners until 1870 [1]. Yosemite Indian 4:08, 5 Jan 2008 (UTC)
The recent afd has a good side effect of bringing out suggestions for article improvement:
hike395 ( talk) 04:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Some lists of books have been added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. You can find the discussions here. RockMagnetist ( talk) 23:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)