![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've just now removed
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)as added much earlier by Lesser Cartographies. This is potentially valuable information but it doesn't seem to belong where it was originally placed. I'm undecided as to where it should go. -- Hoary ( talk) 07:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
In its current form, the introduction talks of:
It could be said that "remarkable" is mere opinion. But I think that the long list that follows justifies use of the term.
The next objection could well be: "Why not simply say how many there are, leaving the reader free to infer that this is remarkable?"
Simply, because they're very hard to count:
And so there's no number. However you care to count them, the number doesn't rival that churned out by Araki (about whose photobooks at least two books do the same job as LL), but it's a lot. All in all, "remarkable" seems justified. -- Hoary ( talk) 00:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've just now removed
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help)as added much earlier by Lesser Cartographies. This is potentially valuable information but it doesn't seem to belong where it was originally placed. I'm undecided as to where it should go. -- Hoary ( talk) 07:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
In its current form, the introduction talks of:
It could be said that "remarkable" is mere opinion. But I think that the long list that follows justifies use of the term.
The next objection could well be: "Why not simply say how many there are, leaving the reader free to infer that this is remarkable?"
Simply, because they're very hard to count:
And so there's no number. However you care to count them, the number doesn't rival that churned out by Araki (about whose photobooks at least two books do the same job as LL), but it's a lot. All in all, "remarkable" seems justified. -- Hoary ( talk) 00:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)