This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bhabiji Ghar Par Hain! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the
help page).
![]() | This
edit request to
Bhabi Ji Ghar Par Hai! has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Number of seasons must be changed to 1.The show is still going on and hasn't been discontinued. A controversy section should be added separately highlighting the controversy created by Shilpa Shinde and the subsequent CINTAA ban on her.References can be taken from these two sources---1) http://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/television/140416/sheetal-khandal-to-replace-shilpa-shinde-in-bhabhiji-ghar-par-hai.html 2) http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/shilpa-shinde-may-be-banned-on-tv-by-the-industry-body-cintaa-bhabhi-ji-ghar-par-hai/1/641751.html 123.136.250.43 ( talk) 07:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
In this edit I cleaned up the cast a bit. There were a few issues, and some still remain. I've had to flag a number of entries as in need of clarification. This is the English Wikipedia, so we need to be presenting content in a way that's clear to all readers of English. It's not clear what a Launda is. Is that a surname? If so, why is it in parentheses? It's not clear what "Amma Ji" is or why it's in parentheses. Is that a nickname? I'm not sure why we're afraid of writing in complete sentences. We're not limited to jamming random words into parentheses and thinking that's quality work. It's also unclear what a "chacha" is. Where I could, I converted the useless parentheticals into semi-complete sentences. (They're not really complete, but they're better than the parentheticals). Also, the section should be broken into Main characters and Recurring characters per MOS:TV. It's unclear why we were using semicolon formatting for the sub-sections rather than the L3 sections (formatted with equals signs) we would typically use for subsections of a level 2 section. For instance this is correct:
While this is not correct:
We don't typically use "Supporting cast" in TV articles. We tend to focus on Main and Recurring. See MOS:TV instructions, specifically WP:TVCAST. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Image in Infobox should be changed because Shilpa Shinde has been replaced by Shubhangi Atre Poorey 117.201.124.211 ( talk) 14:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
In this edit an IP editor added a block of content that seems to be based on their personal opinion. 1) We don't add our own opinions to articles. Period. 2) Any opinions from professional, established critics needs to be supported by references, and 3) they must be presented as opinions, not presented as facts.
More specific objections:
"The show delves in a sensitive topic of extra-marrital affair through a more slapstick comedy manner while never justifying it."- Saying that the series never justifies the slapstick, is an opinionated conclusion. It's not our job to decide whether or not a creative choice is justified. If critics feel this way, then let's present their opinions in an intelligent way. "John Doe of ABC magazine felt ____. "
"The overall response to the show has been very positive in media and viewers alike, with the show becoming a main-stay for the channel."- Says whom?
"some have criticised the content for being adult based"- Says whom?
"the show has developed a cult status among the Indian fans"- Overused fluff. Everything ever created has a "cult" following if we go with the literal definition of cult as a small, loyal niche following. It's meaningless, particularly when there's no decades-long reaffirmation of "cult status". For example, The Rocky Horror Picture Show has been considered a cult hit for 40 years, and there are probably thousands of books that go into detail about this. But a 2015 television series? What mass of references detail this show's "cult status"? Additionally, of course fans of the series would like the series. That's why they're called fans. Repetitive and pointless fluff. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Sidaq pratap ( talk) 4:04 30 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Zafar24: I think this information is not suitable for "Plot" section as per WP:TVPLOT Plot sections should summarize the core storyline(s) and this statement looks like more fit for other section as it talks more about impact and reaction. I think you should think about creating more section on this page where this information can be easily placed. Sid95Q ( talk) 22:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q:Okay dear. Zafar24 Talk 22:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello dear @ Cyphoidbomb: If Shilpa Shinde is original cast then what about Shubhangi Atre, What we call Shubhangi Atre? If Wikipedia is not to Indiscriminate between anything, then why we use word 'original' with Shilpa Shinde? I know that director of the sitcom has used 'original' word in interview but this is Wikipedia and Wikipedia has the policy to use sequre brackets in quote if word is not good to meet Wikipedia policies. You said, "That literally just describes the people who had the role first." If you are talking about first role then also my was right to use the word 'previous'. Zafar24 Talk 16:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: but according to Wikipedia is not for Indiscriminaion. By using the word 'original' we are insulting specially Shubhangi Atre because she is the second cast after Shilpa Shinde. I have an another suggestion that we can use the word [first] instead of word 'original'. It is clearly written in Reception section before quote that "In an interview, the show's director Shashank Bali have acknowledged that when Shilpa Shinde left the show and Shubhangi Atre was roped in for the role of 'Angoori', the show's ratings went down". So it make the quotation clearer if we use the word 'first' instead of word 'previous'. Does that make any sense? Reception section is not about who is original or second and also reception section is not about the reviews of Shilpa Shinde and Shubhangi Atre performances. Then we should not give importance to one cast by using the word 'original' which is Shilpa Shinde. Zafar24 Talk 17:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
On Iron Maiden's departure, Sharon Osbourne came on stage to make a few statements, telling the audience that she "absolutely loved Iron Maiden" but thought that Dickinson is a "prick."We don't refactor quotations just because they don't suit our personal sense of decorum. We only refactor quotatios to make minor clarifications for spelling, syntax, or to remove ambiguities. There is nothing to compromise about here. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: and @ Sid95Q: Thanks for explaining. I understood now. Zafar24 Talk 05:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
"Try to avoid using the [Cast section] as a repository for further "in-universe" information that belongs in the plot summary; instead, focus on real-world information on the characters and actors (this could include, but is not limited to, casting of the actor or how the character was created and developed over the course of the series)."Information about Shinde's departure would very naturally belong in her cast listing. See also List of Millennium characters, which describes the concept and creation of various characters and provides real-world content. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:Hi, I moved the details in other secion which is 'Concept and creation'. Concept and creation is not a sub-section. My intention was not to hide something as I didn't removed the details, I just moved that details. Here my reason why I moved the details : I wanted the readers to know about the role of Angoori has a long concept till now.
Like, 1. Rashmi Desai was selected but she rejected the role because... 2. Shilpa Shinde left because... 3. And 80 actresses gave audition... 4. Shubhangi Atre selected... So basically, my intention of moving the details is a Good faith edit. Because I didn't new in that time when I was editing. I admit my mistake and but I believe that we should not remove that details in Concept and creation' section because that section is giving details about the character of Angoori. Zafar24 Talk 01:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Okay. I removed it form 'concept and creation' section. Zafar24 Talk 22:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Zafar24: Each Genre mentioned Must be reliably sourced So can you please provide a reliable source to justify these additions. Sid95Q ( talk) 17:44, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q:Okay dear. I removed it and when I find reference then I will add again. Zafar24 Talk 22:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q:I added the reference in this edit. Zafar24 Talk 02:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Someone removed the controversy section and this is vandalism so this page should be put in protection. Here it is. Zafar24 Talk 16:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Zafar, please stop adding this to Bhabi Ji Ghar Par Hai!.
Also, did you even check the page history to see why it was removed? I thought I explained it fairly clearly. I've removed the section. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 14:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: I have copy our conversation form my talk page to here in Bhabiji Ghar Par Hain! talk page. See: User_talk:Zafar24/Archive_6#Controversy Zafar24 Talk 08:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Editors removed that controversy section that time because it was not well written and was less in content. I wrote 'Controversy section' with reliable references and added some quote also to justify both sides of producers, co-actresses and Shilpa Shinde. Zafar24 Talk 08:50, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: re: these changes, I haven't read through them for clarity or for fact-checking, or for any kind of quality control, but you should be prepared to defend the deletion of that much sourced content, and I think your first step would have been to open a discussion to explain why you removed it all. Surely some real-world content belongs in an article about a TV series, right? Maybe you disagree with placement or content, but that was a significant deletion. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: Hello there, You said that harassment case is a Shilpa Shinde personal thing, you are wrong dear, because Sanjay Kohli is a producer of the Bhabiji Ghar Par Hai, so Shilpa Shinde and producer are involved in this controversy. So this is a controversy of Bhabhiji Ghar Par Hai. Zafar24 Talk 16:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: Controversy section is not just about Shilpa Shinde but it is about what was the reason that Shinde left the show?, why producers replaced Shilpa Shinde?, as producers of Bhabhiji Ghar Par Hai also involved in this not just Sunjay Kohli but Benaifer Kohli also. You said that controversy section is telling Shilpa Shinde harassment case, I think you should read the controversy section again and you will see that all the things I wrote in controversy section is related to Bhabiji Ghar Par Hai. Zafar24 Talk 16:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: We care because she was part of the show for one year, She was main lead, Sanjay Kohli was involved in it who is a producer of the show. If controversy section is not written neutral point of view for Wikipedia then we should fix that and @ Cyphoidbomb: placed the template of Copyedit, the Controversy section needs copyedit. Zafar24 Talk 16:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: Controversy section not just saying the harassment thing with show producer but How Shilpa Shinde exit from show happened. Why Shilpa Shinde being replace in Bhabiji Ghar Par Hai. Both, Shilpa Shinde and producers have their own stories and no one knows who is saying the right thing. Thats why it is rightly placed in Controversy section. Zafar24 Talk 17:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Quotation too much quotes is not good so I removed the quotes and wrote the sentence by triming unnecessary info in my own words. Zafar24 Talk 01:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Zafar24: Minor is not a valid section as per WP:TVCAST. Why do you think there is any need for this section??. Sid95Q ( talk) 14:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q: Yes, I strongly believe that we should write this as a common sense that those people was seen very less in episode. I think we are misleading the readers by including those people in recurring cast. Zafar24 Talk 14:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q: Meenal as Anita's best friend I didn't wrote that. Please do check edit history before claiming that or just remove that edit. Zafar24 Talk 15:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q: Okay. I just clearing the doubt of your:) Zafar24 Talk 15:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Zafar24 As far as I recall it was added on the page just after I started editing the page, but I did NOT added Meenal's reference. Everything I have added is from a source (mostly). Yes, I have made mistakes here and there in my edits, but this one's clearly isn't mine. Rishabh418b ( talk) 15:41, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Rishabh418b: I am not saying that, you added Meenal character. @ Sid95Q: said that. I was just clearing my side that I didn't added that. Zafar24 Talk 16:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: According to the sources The show is inspired from Shrimaan Shrimati (TV series). It is not an official adaptation of that series. I thought this section is only used if the adaptation is officially based on previously produced or published material not unofficial remakes/adaptaions or works with plagiarism issues. Can this parameter also be used for adaptations like this. Sid95Q ( talk) 03:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Use this field in conjunction with screenplay and story where applicable (i.e. "Screen story") if films are based on previously produced or published material, such as books, plays, articles, old screenplays etc.Ex. Kullfi Kumarr Bajewala is remake version of Potol Kumar Gaanwala, which parameter is not in the "based on" but in the "Related shows". Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 08:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Pls change the role of Annu.... 223.187.154.14 ( talk) 08:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bhabiji Ghar Par Hain! article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the
help page).
![]() | This
edit request to
Bhabi Ji Ghar Par Hai! has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Number of seasons must be changed to 1.The show is still going on and hasn't been discontinued. A controversy section should be added separately highlighting the controversy created by Shilpa Shinde and the subsequent CINTAA ban on her.References can be taken from these two sources---1) http://www.deccanchronicle.com/entertainment/television/140416/sheetal-khandal-to-replace-shilpa-shinde-in-bhabhiji-ghar-par-hai.html 2) http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/shilpa-shinde-may-be-banned-on-tv-by-the-industry-body-cintaa-bhabhi-ji-ghar-par-hai/1/641751.html 123.136.250.43 ( talk) 07:07, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
In this edit I cleaned up the cast a bit. There were a few issues, and some still remain. I've had to flag a number of entries as in need of clarification. This is the English Wikipedia, so we need to be presenting content in a way that's clear to all readers of English. It's not clear what a Launda is. Is that a surname? If so, why is it in parentheses? It's not clear what "Amma Ji" is or why it's in parentheses. Is that a nickname? I'm not sure why we're afraid of writing in complete sentences. We're not limited to jamming random words into parentheses and thinking that's quality work. It's also unclear what a "chacha" is. Where I could, I converted the useless parentheticals into semi-complete sentences. (They're not really complete, but they're better than the parentheticals). Also, the section should be broken into Main characters and Recurring characters per MOS:TV. It's unclear why we were using semicolon formatting for the sub-sections rather than the L3 sections (formatted with equals signs) we would typically use for subsections of a level 2 section. For instance this is correct:
While this is not correct:
We don't typically use "Supporting cast" in TV articles. We tend to focus on Main and Recurring. See MOS:TV instructions, specifically WP:TVCAST. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:59, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Image in Infobox should be changed because Shilpa Shinde has been replaced by Shubhangi Atre Poorey 117.201.124.211 ( talk) 14:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
In this edit an IP editor added a block of content that seems to be based on their personal opinion. 1) We don't add our own opinions to articles. Period. 2) Any opinions from professional, established critics needs to be supported by references, and 3) they must be presented as opinions, not presented as facts.
More specific objections:
"The show delves in a sensitive topic of extra-marrital affair through a more slapstick comedy manner while never justifying it."- Saying that the series never justifies the slapstick, is an opinionated conclusion. It's not our job to decide whether or not a creative choice is justified. If critics feel this way, then let's present their opinions in an intelligent way. "John Doe of ABC magazine felt ____. "
"The overall response to the show has been very positive in media and viewers alike, with the show becoming a main-stay for the channel."- Says whom?
"some have criticised the content for being adult based"- Says whom?
"the show has developed a cult status among the Indian fans"- Overused fluff. Everything ever created has a "cult" following if we go with the literal definition of cult as a small, loyal niche following. It's meaningless, particularly when there's no decades-long reaffirmation of "cult status". For example, The Rocky Horror Picture Show has been considered a cult hit for 40 years, and there are probably thousands of books that go into detail about this. But a 2015 television series? What mass of references detail this show's "cult status"? Additionally, of course fans of the series would like the series. That's why they're called fans. Repetitive and pointless fluff. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 19:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Sidaq pratap ( talk) 4:04 30 January 2018 (UTC)
@ Zafar24: I think this information is not suitable for "Plot" section as per WP:TVPLOT Plot sections should summarize the core storyline(s) and this statement looks like more fit for other section as it talks more about impact and reaction. I think you should think about creating more section on this page where this information can be easily placed. Sid95Q ( talk) 22:09, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q:Okay dear. Zafar24 Talk 22:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello dear @ Cyphoidbomb: If Shilpa Shinde is original cast then what about Shubhangi Atre, What we call Shubhangi Atre? If Wikipedia is not to Indiscriminate between anything, then why we use word 'original' with Shilpa Shinde? I know that director of the sitcom has used 'original' word in interview but this is Wikipedia and Wikipedia has the policy to use sequre brackets in quote if word is not good to meet Wikipedia policies. You said, "That literally just describes the people who had the role first." If you are talking about first role then also my was right to use the word 'previous'. Zafar24 Talk 16:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: but according to Wikipedia is not for Indiscriminaion. By using the word 'original' we are insulting specially Shubhangi Atre because she is the second cast after Shilpa Shinde. I have an another suggestion that we can use the word [first] instead of word 'original'. It is clearly written in Reception section before quote that "In an interview, the show's director Shashank Bali have acknowledged that when Shilpa Shinde left the show and Shubhangi Atre was roped in for the role of 'Angoori', the show's ratings went down". So it make the quotation clearer if we use the word 'first' instead of word 'previous'. Does that make any sense? Reception section is not about who is original or second and also reception section is not about the reviews of Shilpa Shinde and Shubhangi Atre performances. Then we should not give importance to one cast by using the word 'original' which is Shilpa Shinde. Zafar24 Talk 17:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
On Iron Maiden's departure, Sharon Osbourne came on stage to make a few statements, telling the audience that she "absolutely loved Iron Maiden" but thought that Dickinson is a "prick."We don't refactor quotations just because they don't suit our personal sense of decorum. We only refactor quotatios to make minor clarifications for spelling, syntax, or to remove ambiguities. There is nothing to compromise about here. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: and @ Sid95Q: Thanks for explaining. I understood now. Zafar24 Talk 05:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
"Try to avoid using the [Cast section] as a repository for further "in-universe" information that belongs in the plot summary; instead, focus on real-world information on the characters and actors (this could include, but is not limited to, casting of the actor or how the character was created and developed over the course of the series)."Information about Shinde's departure would very naturally belong in her cast listing. See also List of Millennium characters, which describes the concept and creation of various characters and provides real-world content. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 18:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb:Hi, I moved the details in other secion which is 'Concept and creation'. Concept and creation is not a sub-section. My intention was not to hide something as I didn't removed the details, I just moved that details. Here my reason why I moved the details : I wanted the readers to know about the role of Angoori has a long concept till now.
Like, 1. Rashmi Desai was selected but she rejected the role because... 2. Shilpa Shinde left because... 3. And 80 actresses gave audition... 4. Shubhangi Atre selected... So basically, my intention of moving the details is a Good faith edit. Because I didn't new in that time when I was editing. I admit my mistake and but I believe that we should not remove that details in Concept and creation' section because that section is giving details about the character of Angoori. Zafar24 Talk 01:30, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Okay. I removed it form 'concept and creation' section. Zafar24 Talk 22:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Zafar24: Each Genre mentioned Must be reliably sourced So can you please provide a reliable source to justify these additions. Sid95Q ( talk) 17:44, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q:Okay dear. I removed it and when I find reference then I will add again. Zafar24 Talk 22:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q:I added the reference in this edit. Zafar24 Talk 02:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Someone removed the controversy section and this is vandalism so this page should be put in protection. Here it is. Zafar24 Talk 16:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Zafar, please stop adding this to Bhabi Ji Ghar Par Hai!.
Also, did you even check the page history to see why it was removed? I thought I explained it fairly clearly. I've removed the section. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 14:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: I have copy our conversation form my talk page to here in Bhabiji Ghar Par Hain! talk page. See: User_talk:Zafar24/Archive_6#Controversy Zafar24 Talk 08:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Editors removed that controversy section that time because it was not well written and was less in content. I wrote 'Controversy section' with reliable references and added some quote also to justify both sides of producers, co-actresses and Shilpa Shinde. Zafar24 Talk 08:50, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: re: these changes, I haven't read through them for clarity or for fact-checking, or for any kind of quality control, but you should be prepared to defend the deletion of that much sourced content, and I think your first step would have been to open a discussion to explain why you removed it all. Surely some real-world content belongs in an article about a TV series, right? Maybe you disagree with placement or content, but that was a significant deletion. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: Hello there, You said that harassment case is a Shilpa Shinde personal thing, you are wrong dear, because Sanjay Kohli is a producer of the Bhabiji Ghar Par Hai, so Shilpa Shinde and producer are involved in this controversy. So this is a controversy of Bhabhiji Ghar Par Hai. Zafar24 Talk 16:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: Controversy section is not just about Shilpa Shinde but it is about what was the reason that Shinde left the show?, why producers replaced Shilpa Shinde?, as producers of Bhabhiji Ghar Par Hai also involved in this not just Sunjay Kohli but Benaifer Kohli also. You said that controversy section is telling Shilpa Shinde harassment case, I think you should read the controversy section again and you will see that all the things I wrote in controversy section is related to Bhabiji Ghar Par Hai. Zafar24 Talk 16:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: We care because she was part of the show for one year, She was main lead, Sanjay Kohli was involved in it who is a producer of the show. If controversy section is not written neutral point of view for Wikipedia then we should fix that and @ Cyphoidbomb: placed the template of Copyedit, the Controversy section needs copyedit. Zafar24 Talk 16:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Siddiqsazzad001: Controversy section not just saying the harassment thing with show producer but How Shilpa Shinde exit from show happened. Why Shilpa Shinde being replace in Bhabiji Ghar Par Hai. Both, Shilpa Shinde and producers have their own stories and no one knows who is saying the right thing. Thats why it is rightly placed in Controversy section. Zafar24 Talk 17:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
According to Wikipedia:Quotation too much quotes is not good so I removed the quotes and wrote the sentence by triming unnecessary info in my own words. Zafar24 Talk 01:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
@ Zafar24: Minor is not a valid section as per WP:TVCAST. Why do you think there is any need for this section??. Sid95Q ( talk) 14:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q: Yes, I strongly believe that we should write this as a common sense that those people was seen very less in episode. I think we are misleading the readers by including those people in recurring cast. Zafar24 Talk 14:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q: Meenal as Anita's best friend I didn't wrote that. Please do check edit history before claiming that or just remove that edit. Zafar24 Talk 15:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Sid95Q: Okay. I just clearing the doubt of your:) Zafar24 Talk 15:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Zafar24 As far as I recall it was added on the page just after I started editing the page, but I did NOT added Meenal's reference. Everything I have added is from a source (mostly). Yes, I have made mistakes here and there in my edits, but this one's clearly isn't mine. Rishabh418b ( talk) 15:41, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Rishabh418b: I am not saying that, you added Meenal character. @ Sid95Q: said that. I was just clearing my side that I didn't added that. Zafar24 Talk 16:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: According to the sources The show is inspired from Shrimaan Shrimati (TV series). It is not an official adaptation of that series. I thought this section is only used if the adaptation is officially based on previously produced or published material not unofficial remakes/adaptaions or works with plagiarism issues. Can this parameter also be used for adaptations like this. Sid95Q ( talk) 03:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Use this field in conjunction with screenplay and story where applicable (i.e. "Screen story") if films are based on previously produced or published material, such as books, plays, articles, old screenplays etc.Ex. Kullfi Kumarr Bajewala is remake version of Potol Kumar Gaanwala, which parameter is not in the "based on" but in the "Related shows". Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 08:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Pls change the role of Annu.... 223.187.154.14 ( talk) 08:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)