Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBetter in Time has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 2, 2010 Peer reviewReviewed
November 30, 2010 Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Move?

Should the page be moved from "Better in Time" to "Better in Time (Song)" because all of her other released songs have "(Song)" at the end of their articles? 12bigbrother12 ( talk) 16:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply

No, it's not an ambiguous title so there's no need to disambiguate. But it would be "(song)" rather than "(Song)". anemone│ projectors 18:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply
In fact, "Footprints in the Sand" is the only one with a disambiguator at the moment. anemone│ projectors 18:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Date has been pused back to 15th July

Hey guys Better in time has a new release date of 15th July. ( Sexty2 ( talk) 17:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)) reply

YouTube

On Leona Lewis' YouTube page, US YouTubers can only view the video of "Better in Time" with the scenes of Leona and the horse included with it. There is another music video of "Better in Time" uploaded today that US residents can not view, but in the article of this song, it states, "For the US release, the "Better In Time" music video was slightly changed. The scenes featuring Lewis with a horse were replaced with additional shots from the other parts of the video." Contradiction, I think so. Leor Natanov ( talk) 01:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The modified video is almost certainly intended for the US market. However, there appears to be a problem with the broadcast options. This will probably be corrected in due course. ~ smb 09:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC) reply
It has been two days already... the error still remains. Leor Natanov ( talk) 05:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC) reply
There is no contradiction. I have seen the re-edited United States video; the horse scenes have indeed been removed. It is this video that is currently playing to American audiences. YouTube is merely a technicality. ~ smb 07:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I have totally agreed with you in the beginning. I just hope YouTube corrects this error. Leor Natanov ( talk) 04:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Still not corrected. Leor Natanov ( talk) 00:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a matter that concerns the official channel and not Wikipedia. It's not easy to communicate with them. — eon, 09:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC) reply

[Re entry on BIllboard hot 100 at#75] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.56.213 ( talk) 18:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hey WILL SOMEONE KEEP THIS PAGE UPDATED actually metion its now 61 on the Billboard hot 100.

R&B hot 100

Debut 99 R&B hot 100 US

Vocal Range

The highest pitch in the song is a G#5 in falsetto at the end as the song fades. Not a B5. Listen to the falsetto note at the end of the song and then listen to the B5 in I Will be. Common sense tells you that they are not the same pitch. The only source I have for this is my knowledge of vocals, especially Leona's. calvin999 ( talk) 18:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply

This is original research and we have it sourced to the sheet music, you can't get much more reliable than that. – anemone projectors– 10:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Well, it's wrong lol. Listen to that note in Better In Time and then the B5 in I Will Be. Common sense tells you that they are not the same pitch. Mores to the point, Leona replicated the same note live in at the end of Better in Time, and it is a G#5. calvin999 ( talk) 13:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Common sense and "it is [note] because I studied music" are not reliable sources. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 18:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This is so frustrating! lol calvin999 ( talk) 19:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Leona lewis-better in time s.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Leona lewis-better in time s.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 08:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Better_in_Time&oldid=1206275190"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBetter in Time has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 2, 2010 Peer reviewReviewed
November 30, 2010 Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Move?

Should the page be moved from "Better in Time" to "Better in Time (Song)" because all of her other released songs have "(Song)" at the end of their articles? 12bigbrother12 ( talk) 16:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply

No, it's not an ambiguous title so there's no need to disambiguate. But it would be "(song)" rather than "(Song)". anemone│ projectors 18:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply
In fact, "Footprints in the Sand" is the only one with a disambiguator at the moment. anemone│ projectors 18:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Date has been pused back to 15th July

Hey guys Better in time has a new release date of 15th July. ( Sexty2 ( talk) 17:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)) reply

YouTube

On Leona Lewis' YouTube page, US YouTubers can only view the video of "Better in Time" with the scenes of Leona and the horse included with it. There is another music video of "Better in Time" uploaded today that US residents can not view, but in the article of this song, it states, "For the US release, the "Better In Time" music video was slightly changed. The scenes featuring Lewis with a horse were replaced with additional shots from the other parts of the video." Contradiction, I think so. Leor Natanov ( talk) 01:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC) reply

The modified video is almost certainly intended for the US market. However, there appears to be a problem with the broadcast options. This will probably be corrected in due course. ~ smb 09:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC) reply
It has been two days already... the error still remains. Leor Natanov ( talk) 05:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC) reply
There is no contradiction. I have seen the re-edited United States video; the horse scenes have indeed been removed. It is this video that is currently playing to American audiences. YouTube is merely a technicality. ~ smb 07:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I have totally agreed with you in the beginning. I just hope YouTube corrects this error. Leor Natanov ( talk) 04:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Still not corrected. Leor Natanov ( talk) 00:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a matter that concerns the official channel and not Wikipedia. It's not easy to communicate with them. — eon, 09:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC) reply

[Re entry on BIllboard hot 100 at#75] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.56.213 ( talk) 18:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hey WILL SOMEONE KEEP THIS PAGE UPDATED actually metion its now 61 on the Billboard hot 100.

R&B hot 100

Debut 99 R&B hot 100 US

Vocal Range

The highest pitch in the song is a G#5 in falsetto at the end as the song fades. Not a B5. Listen to the falsetto note at the end of the song and then listen to the B5 in I Will be. Common sense tells you that they are not the same pitch. The only source I have for this is my knowledge of vocals, especially Leona's. calvin999 ( talk) 18:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC) reply

This is original research and we have it sourced to the sheet music, you can't get much more reliable than that. – anemone projectors– 10:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Well, it's wrong lol. Listen to that note in Better In Time and then the B5 in I Will Be. Common sense tells you that they are not the same pitch. Mores to the point, Leona replicated the same note live in at the end of Better in Time, and it is a G#5. calvin999 ( talk) 13:02, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Common sense and "it is [note] because I studied music" are not reliable sources. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 18:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
This is so frustrating! lol calvin999 ( talk) 19:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Leona lewis-better in time s.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Leona lewis-better in time s.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 08:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{ cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{ nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 16 external links on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Better in Time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Better_in_Time&oldid=1206275190"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE