![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I have made some corrections, but this article clearly needs a refreshed focus: this article could potentially give a reader information about the architecture and use of study halls
1)the words structure, insitution, serves are used improperly 2)is a "characteristic" BM supposed to be a typical one? Most BMs have far more books than that 3)the comment about the probable location of study in the time of the Mishna is conjecture 4)this is a dictionary entry? the part about yeshiva is unnecessary. The reference to BMs changing roles is an anachronism, at least in the US. That is more reflective of the situation in pre-WW2 Europe. 5)should Jewish laws about the study hall be included?
Econapl 19:13, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus. - Andrew c [talk] 15:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Should it not be writen "Bait Midrash" or like the ashkenazi pronounciation "Bais Misdrash" Actictecture is nonexistent, as many have been set up basments, and in shuls they have no real design. Bais Midrash have as many book as they can afford, from a few chumashim two tweny sets of shash. THe laws are not inportant, as many are obvious.
Bait, Beit, Beis, Beth -- Discuss. -- Avi 19:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
L'fi WP:COMMONNAME the page should be Beis Medrash, There were at least 200,000 more google hits for Beis Medrash than for the closest runner up. -- Shuliavrumi ( talk) 15:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
TheZoomTorah, your edits are not in accord with Wikipedia's encyclopedic style; please read WP:MOS. I reverted your last edits because matzav.com is not a reliable source; it copies from other websites. If you feel this is a legitimate topic, please use reliable sources from newspapers, books, and magazines. Thank you, Yoninah ( talk) 13:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about that yoninah, i didn't know how to talk here. I have read your reference, please note the following within your selection.
"Whether a specific news story is reliable for a fact or statement should be examined on a case-by-case basis." Do you contest the fact that the creators said so?
Also: "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact."
Please revert your edit yourself.
Thank
p.s. i hope you aren't insulted.
"Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact." As such matzav.com is a source for what the creators of that app said. Please revert your edit or go to conflict resolution. And please No 'you', blaming is not the way of a jew nor of a wikipedian! TheZoomTorah ( talk) 15:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
However they generally they don't provide for the Chavrusa style learning that is typical of a bais medrash study hall.I'm sure that videoconferencing can handle the chavrusa aspect as well. I suggest that you look up "virtual beis midrash" on Google, Google Books, and any other newspaper or magazine sources and then write this section based on what you read. Yoninah ( talk) 20:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I have made some corrections, but this article clearly needs a refreshed focus: this article could potentially give a reader information about the architecture and use of study halls
1)the words structure, insitution, serves are used improperly 2)is a "characteristic" BM supposed to be a typical one? Most BMs have far more books than that 3)the comment about the probable location of study in the time of the Mishna is conjecture 4)this is a dictionary entry? the part about yeshiva is unnecessary. The reference to BMs changing roles is an anachronism, at least in the US. That is more reflective of the situation in pre-WW2 Europe. 5)should Jewish laws about the study hall be included?
Econapl 19:13, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus. - Andrew c [talk] 15:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Should it not be writen "Bait Midrash" or like the ashkenazi pronounciation "Bais Misdrash" Actictecture is nonexistent, as many have been set up basments, and in shuls they have no real design. Bais Midrash have as many book as they can afford, from a few chumashim two tweny sets of shash. THe laws are not inportant, as many are obvious.
Bait, Beit, Beis, Beth -- Discuss. -- Avi 19:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
L'fi WP:COMMONNAME the page should be Beis Medrash, There were at least 200,000 more google hits for Beis Medrash than for the closest runner up. -- Shuliavrumi ( talk) 15:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
TheZoomTorah, your edits are not in accord with Wikipedia's encyclopedic style; please read WP:MOS. I reverted your last edits because matzav.com is not a reliable source; it copies from other websites. If you feel this is a legitimate topic, please use reliable sources from newspapers, books, and magazines. Thank you, Yoninah ( talk) 13:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about that yoninah, i didn't know how to talk here. I have read your reference, please note the following within your selection.
"Whether a specific news story is reliable for a fact or statement should be examined on a case-by-case basis." Do you contest the fact that the creators said so?
Also: "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact."
Please revert your edit yourself.
Thank
p.s. i hope you aren't insulted.
"Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (op-eds) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact." As such matzav.com is a source for what the creators of that app said. Please revert your edit or go to conflict resolution. And please No 'you', blaming is not the way of a jew nor of a wikipedian! TheZoomTorah ( talk) 15:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
However they generally they don't provide for the Chavrusa style learning that is typical of a bais medrash study hall.I'm sure that videoconferencing can handle the chavrusa aspect as well. I suggest that you look up "virtual beis midrash" on Google, Google Books, and any other newspaper or magazine sources and then write this section based on what you read. Yoninah ( talk) 20:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)