![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link points to error 404. 217.98.142.167 00:14, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
Currently the article only includes two example code fragments with no explanation of why or how the algorithm works. If I get time, I'll add a reasonable explantion to the article. Rcgldr ( talk) 03:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
The aricle includes this statement:
The algorithm became the key to practical application of the now ubiquitous ReedâSolomon code.
However, the key to practical application of Reed Solomon code was establishing a relationship between the coefficients of the error locator polynomial and the syndromes that result in a set of linear equations which can be solved through conventional methods, as described in Peterson_decoder. Berlekamp Massey and other methods like the Euclidean algorithm are just optimized methods used to solve the same set of linear equations.
I recommend simply deleting this statement, or just stating that Berlekamp Massey algorithm optimizes the process of solving the set of linear equations as decribed in Peterson_decoder.
Rcgldr ( talk) 03:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
BerlekampâMassey algorithm. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.â cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
someone had already changed the wayback link to a useful one. so even though the bot botched it, the link is good on the article page. John Comeau ( talk) 04:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
the indents show correctly in the editor, but not so in the actual page. I'll see if I can figure it out. John Comeau ( talk) 06:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
it was because of a mix of hard tabs ('\t') and spaces. duh. John Comeau ( talk) 06:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
looking over the whole article, it becomes clear that the origin of the problematic variable names were in the pseudocode preceding the Java source. the original Java code matched more closely the naming in the rest of the article. I'm going to edit the pseudocode, then change the Java source to match. then the whole article will use the same standard, hopefully making everything clearer. John Comeau ( talk) 03:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
main()
as a test. The effort on WP is not about programming but rather algorithms. I ultimately delete the Java code section because WP is not a code repository, and psuedocode algorithms are preferred over specific languages.
Glrx (
talk)
20:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)I believe that there's a bug in the pseudo-code, and the loop should start from n=L. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.226.10.63 ( talk ⢠contribs) 12:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link points to error 404. 217.98.142.167 00:14, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
Currently the article only includes two example code fragments with no explanation of why or how the algorithm works. If I get time, I'll add a reasonable explantion to the article. Rcgldr ( talk) 03:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
The aricle includes this statement:
The algorithm became the key to practical application of the now ubiquitous ReedâSolomon code.
However, the key to practical application of Reed Solomon code was establishing a relationship between the coefficients of the error locator polynomial and the syndromes that result in a set of linear equations which can be solved through conventional methods, as described in Peterson_decoder. Berlekamp Massey and other methods like the Euclidean algorithm are just optimized methods used to solve the same set of linear equations.
I recommend simply deleting this statement, or just stating that Berlekamp Massey algorithm optimizes the process of solving the set of linear equations as decribed in Peterson_decoder.
Rcgldr ( talk) 03:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
BerlekampâMassey algorithm. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the
|checked=
to true
Cheers.â cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
someone had already changed the wayback link to a useful one. so even though the bot botched it, the link is good on the article page. John Comeau ( talk) 04:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
the indents show correctly in the editor, but not so in the actual page. I'll see if I can figure it out. John Comeau ( talk) 06:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
it was because of a mix of hard tabs ('\t') and spaces. duh. John Comeau ( talk) 06:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
looking over the whole article, it becomes clear that the origin of the problematic variable names were in the pseudocode preceding the Java source. the original Java code matched more closely the naming in the rest of the article. I'm going to edit the pseudocode, then change the Java source to match. then the whole article will use the same standard, hopefully making everything clearer. John Comeau ( talk) 03:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
main()
as a test. The effort on WP is not about programming but rather algorithms. I ultimately delete the Java code section because WP is not a code repository, and psuedocode algorithms are preferred over specific languages.
Glrx (
talk)
20:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)I believe that there's a bug in the pseudo-code, and the loop should start from n=L. â Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.226.10.63 ( talk ⢠contribs) 12:37, 18 May 2019 (UTC)