The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk ( talk · contribs) 18:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
People checking the recently promoted GA feed must be wondering where all these sopranos are coming from!
MyCatIsAChonk (
talk) (
not me) (
also not me) (
still no)
18:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is clear and free of typos. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | No fiction, words to watch, or lists; lead is well-written | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Citations are placed in a proper "References" section | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Sources include mostly websites for various ensembles, like the Vienna Opera's website- all good. Her Großes Sängerlexikon is the most cited, also reliable.
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | I don't see a need for a spotcheck; I would have a hard time doing one, anyway, as many sources are in Swedish. Article is well-cited throughout; no OR visible | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig shows no violations | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Article addresses the necessary aspects | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Stays focused throughout | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No bias visible | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit warring | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Image is properly CC tagged | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Image is relevant and properly captioned | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Replies
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk ( talk · contribs) 18:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
People checking the recently promoted GA feed must be wondering where all these sopranos are coming from!
MyCatIsAChonk (
talk) (
not me) (
also not me) (
still no)
18:57, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is clear and free of typos. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | No fiction, words to watch, or lists; lead is well-written | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Citations are placed in a proper "References" section | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Sources include mostly websites for various ensembles, like the Vienna Opera's website- all good. Her Großes Sängerlexikon is the most cited, also reliable.
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | I don't see a need for a spotcheck; I would have a hard time doing one, anyway, as many sources are in Swedish. Article is well-cited throughout; no OR visible | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig shows no violations | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Article addresses the necessary aspects | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Stays focused throughout | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No bias visible | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit warring | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Image is properly CC tagged | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Image is relevant and properly captioned | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Replies